republic-os/legal/us/code/title-14/chapter-11/section-1135.md

type, title, description, jurisdiction, corpus, kind, title_number, title_name, chapter_number, chapter_name, section, citation, status, release_point, release_date, source, source_url, source_identifier, source_file, source_hash, raw_snapshot_hash, text_hash, retrieved_at, confidence, tags

type	title	description	jurisdiction	corpus	kind	title_number	title_name	chapter_number	chapter_name	section	citation	status	release_point	release_date	source	source_url	source_identifier	source_file	source_hash	raw_snapshot_hash	text_hash	retrieved_at	confidence	tags
LegalText	14 U.S.C. § 1135	Acquisition program baseline breach	us	united_states_code	code_section	14	COAST GUARD	11	ACQUISITIONS	1135	14 U.S.C. § 1135	current	119-100	2026-06-26	official	https://uscode.house.gov/download/releasepoints/us/pl/119/100/xml_usc14@119-100.zip	/us/usc/t14/s1135	data/legal/raw/us/code/title-14/usc14.xml	1d86463282118917e3cd1aef391a47d0ec72559ed68da55f4007b5cd30118ac6	0a287809467d795ac0e1a72d6743ea6b1d340c0f74c77c67bfeba10724006304	cb76d0a8d3ec18966f5880ee56cfc8394185ce1350d9f459d4321715c713c3fd	2026-07-04	official	legal us-code

14 U.S.C. § 1135 - Acquisition program baseline breach

Text

(a) In General.— The Commandant shall submit a report to the appropriate congressional committees and the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives as soon as possible, but not later than 30 days, after the Chief Acquisition Officer of the Coast Guard becomes aware of the breach of an acquisition program baseline for any Level 1 or Level 2 acquisition program, by—

(1) a likely cost overrun greater than 15 percent of the acquisition program baseline for that individual capability or asset or a class of capabilities or assets;

(2) a likely delay of more than 180 days in the delivery schedule for any individual capability or asset or class of capabilities or assets; or

(3) an anticipated failure for any individual capability or asset or class of capabilities or assets to satisfy any key performance threshold or parameter under the acquisition program baseline.

(b) Content.— The report submitted under subsection (a) shall include—

(1) a detailed description of the breach and an explanation of its cause;

(2) the projected impact to performance, cost, and schedule;

(3) an updated acquisition program baseline and the complete history of changes to the original acquisition program baseline;

(4) the updated acquisition schedule and the complete history of changes to the original schedule;

(5) a full life-cycle cost analysis for the capability or asset or class of capabilities or assets;

(6) a remediation plan identifying corrective actions and any resulting issues or risks; and

(7) a description of how progress in the remediation plan will be measured and monitored.

(c) Substantial Variances in Costs or Schedule.— If a likely cost overrun is greater than 20 percent or a likely delay is greater than 12 months from the costs and schedule described in the acquisition program baseline for any Level 1 or Level 2 acquisition project or program of the Coast Guard, the Commandant shall include in the report a written determination, with a supporting explanation, of whether—

(1) the capability or asset or capability or asset class to be acquired under the project or program is essential to the accomplishment of Coast Guard missions;

(2) there are no alternatives to such capability or asset or capability or asset class that will provide equal or greater capability in both a more cost-effective and timely manner;

(3) the new acquisition schedule and estimates for total acquisition cost are reasonable; and

(4) the management structure for the acquisition program is adequate to manage and control performance, cost, and schedule.

(d) Notice to Congress With Respect to Breach of Contract.— Not later than 48 hours after the Commandant becomes aware that a major acquisition contract cannot be carried out under the terms specified in the contract, the Commandant shall provide a written notification to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives that includes—

(1) a description of the terms of the contract that cannot be met; and

(2) an assessment of whether the applicable contract officer has issued a cease and desist order to the contractor based on the breach of such terms of the contract.

(Added Pub. L. 111–281, title IV, § 402(a), Oct. 15, 2010, 124 Stat. 2947, § 575; amended Pub. L. 115–232, div. C, title XXXV, § 3533(g), Aug. 13, 2018, 132 Stat. 2321; renumbered § 1135, Pub. L. 115–282, title I, § 108(b), Dec. 4, 2018, 132 Stat. 4208; Pub. L. 116–283, div. G, title LVXXXII [LXXXII], § 8221(b), Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 4657.)

Notes

Editorial Notes

Amendments2021—Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–283 added subsec. (d). 2018—Pub. L. 115–282 renumbered section 575 of this title as this section. Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 115–232, in introductory provisions, substituted “determination, with a supporting explanation, of whether” for “certification, with a supporting explanation, that”.