Files
2026-07-06 17:28:36 -04:00

9.0 KiB

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction legislature session identifier citation classification subjects status primary_sponsors version_count action_count vote_count first_action last_action source source_identifier source_url source_hash vintage source_snapshot retrieved_at confidence tags
Bill Flood protection. (1) Existing law prohibits the legislative body of a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley, after the adoption of specified amendments to the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance, from entering into a development agreement for property that is located within a flood hazard zone, unless the legislative body makes one of several possible determinations, one of which is a determination that the local flood management agency has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system. Existing law, after the adoption of those amendments, also conditions the approval of a discretionary entitlement or ministerial permit that would result in the construction of a new residence for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, and the approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map as specified, for a subdivision that is located within a flood hazard zone, upon the legislative body making one of several possible determinations, one of which is a determination that the local flood management agency has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system. Existing law defines "adequate progress" to mean, among other things, that the revenues sufficient to fund each year of the project schedule for the flood protection system have been identified, and that at least 90% of the revenues scheduled to have been received in any given year have been appropriated and are being expended. us/states/ca California Legislature 20092010 AB 1165 California AB 1165 (20092010)
bill
Flood protection.
enacted
Yamada
8 28 6 2009-02-27 2009-10-11 openstates ocd-bill/aa461b22-6b55-4605-8fa7-a589a02c4fb7 http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=200920100AB1165 1d07711b23cb66f1939b4378b21ba7b97ec12fc3b16a9f2c37d07a160b2c06a9 2026-07-01 https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump 2026-07-06 reported
legislation
bill
us-ca

California AB 1165 (20092010) — Flood protection.

(1) Existing law prohibits the legislative body of a city or county within the Sacramento-San Joaquin Valley, after the adoption of specified amendments to the applicable general plan or zoning ordinance, from entering into a development agreement for property that is located within a flood hazard zone, unless the legislative body makes one of several possible determinations, one of which is a determination that the local flood management agency has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system. Existing law, after the adoption of those amendments, also conditions the approval of a discretionary entitlement or ministerial permit that would result in the construction of a new residence for a project that is located within a flood hazard zone, and the approval of a tentative map, or a parcel map as specified, for a subdivision that is located within a flood hazard zone, upon the legislative body making one of several possible determinations, one of which is a determination that the local flood management agency has made adequate progress on the construction of a flood protection system. Existing law defines "adequate progress" to mean, among other things, that the revenues sufficient to fund each year of the project schedule for the flood protection system have been identified, and that at least 90% of the revenues scheduled to have been received in any given year have been appropriated and are being expended.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

  1. 02/27/09 - Introduced (filed) — source
  2. 04/15/09 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
  3. 05/14/09 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
  4. 07/06/09 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  5. 08/17/09 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  6. 10/11/09 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
  7. AB1165 (committee substitute) — source
  8. 09/02/09 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

  • AB 1165 YAMADA Consent Calendar Second Day Regular Session — pass (pass) · lower
  • Do pass as amended, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent. — pass (pass) · upper
  • Do pass, to Consent Calendar. — pass (pass) · lower
  • Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. — pass (pass) · lower
  • Special Consent #16 AB1165 Yamada By Wolk — pass (pass) · upper
  • AB 1165 YAMADA Concurrence in Senate Amendments — pass (pass) · lower

Sponsors

  • Yamada — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

  • 2009-02-27 Introduced. To print. introduction
  • 2009-03-01 From printer. May be heard in committee March 30.
  • 2009-03-02 Read first time. reading-1
  • 2009-03-26 Referred to Com. on W.,P. & W. referral-committee
  • 2009-04-15 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on W.,P. & W. Read second time and amended. amendment-introduction, reading-2, amendment-passage, reading-1
  • 2009-04-16 Re-referred to Com. on W.,P. & W. referral-committee
  • 2009-04-29 From committee: Do pass, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Re-referred. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 28). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
  • 2009-05-13 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  • 2009-05-14 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended. amendment-introduction, reading-2, amendment-passage, reading-1
  • 2009-05-18 Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee
  • 2009-05-21 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 20). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
  • 2009-05-26 Read second time. To Consent Calendar. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2009-05-28 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1768.) reading-3, passage, reading-1
  • 2009-05-28 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
  • 2009-06-11 Referred to Com. on N.R. & W. referral-committee
  • 2009-07-02 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 23). amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, committee-passage
  • 2009-07-06 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. amendment-passage, referral-committee, reading-2, reading-1
  • 2009-07-20 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  • 2009-08-17 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. amendment-introduction, reading-2, amendment-passage, referral-committee, reading-1
  • 2009-08-18 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. committee-passage
  • 2009-08-19 Read second time. To third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2009-08-24 Ordered to Special Consent Calendar.
  • 2009-08-27 Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 1979.) reading-3, passage, reading-1
  • 2009-08-27 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
  • 2009-08-31 Senate amendments concurred in. To enrollment. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2794.) amendment-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2009-09-04 Enrolled and to the Governor at 2 p.m.
  • 2009-10-11 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
  • 2009-10-11 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 275, Statutes of 2009.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/aa461b22-6b55-4605-8fa7-a589a02c4fb7. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).