Existing law authorizes transit operators to enter into a design-build contract, as defined, according to specified procedures. Existing law requires a transit operator that uses the design-build process to report to the Legislative Analyst on each public works project procured through the design-build process within 120 days of the design-build project being put into operation or by December 1, 2005, whichever occurs first. Existing law requires certain information submitted under the design-build provisions to be submitted under penalty of perjury. Existing law repeals provisions regarding transit design-build contracts on January 1, 2011.
California AB 729 (20092010) — Public contracts: transit design-build contracts.
Existing law authorizes transit operators to enter into a design-build contract, as defined, according to specified procedures. Existing law requires a transit operator that uses the design-build process to report to the Legislative Analyst on each public works project procured through the design-build process within 120 days of the design-build project being put into operation or by December 1, 2005, whichever occurs first. Existing law requires certain information submitted under the design-build provisions to be submitted under penalty of perjury. Existing law repeals provisions regarding transit design-build contracts on January 1, 2011.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. — pass (pass) · upper
Do pass. — pass (pass) · upper
Sponsors
Evans — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
2009-02-26 Read first time. To print. reading-1
2009-02-27 From printer. May be heard in committee March 29.
2009-03-26 Referred to Com. on TRANS. referral-committee
2009-04-21 From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 20). amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, committee-passage
2009-04-22 Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading. amendment-passage, reading-2, reading-1
2009-04-23 Read second time. To third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2009-04-23 Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5. referral-committee
2009-05-07 From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (May 6). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
2009-05-11 Read second time. To Consent Calendar. reading-2, reading-1
2009-05-14 Read third time, passed, and to Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1469.) reading-3, passage, reading-1
2009-05-14 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
2009-05-21 Referred to Com. on T. & H. referral-committee
2009-06-29 From committee: Amend, do pass as amended, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 23). amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, committee-passage
2009-06-30 Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. amendment-passage, referral-committee, reading-2, reading-1
2009-07-14 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (July 13). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
2009-07-15 Read second time. To third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2009-08-31 Read third time, passed, and to Assembly. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 2010.) reading-3, passage, reading-1
2009-09-01 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.