republic-os/legislation/us/states/ca/20112012/ab-1085.md

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags

type	title	description	jurisdiction	legislature	session	identifier	citation	classification	subjects	status	primary_sponsors	version_count	action_count	vote_count	first_action	last_action	source	source_identifier	source_url	source_hash	vintage	source_snapshot	retrieved_at	confidence	tags
Bill	School attendance: interdistrict attendance.	Existing law authorizes the governing boards of 2 or more school districts to enter into an agreement for the interdistrict attendance of pupils who are residents of the school districts. If either school district fails to approve the interdistrict attendance of a pupil, or in the case of the failure or refusal of the school districts to enter into an agreement, existing law authorizes the person having legal custody of the pupil to appeal to the county board of education in accordance with a prescribed procedure. Existing law requires the county board of education to determine, within 30 calendar days after the appeal is filed, whether the pupil should be permitted to attend in the school district in which the pupil desires to attend and the applicable period of time.	us/states/ca	California Legislature	20112012	AB 1085	California AB 1085 (20112012)	bill	School attendance: interdistrict attendance.	enacted	Davis	6	19	5	2011-02-18	2011-07-15	openstates	ocd-bill/06efa023-4238-471b-ba41-ce7525dee5d4	http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB1085	70c108060f82d625e00e20b70e3e70b0ce947c81031ce11b692755bec6614765	2026-07-01	https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump	2026-07-06	reported	legislation bill us-ca

California AB 1085 (20112012) — School attendance: interdistrict attendance.

Existing law authorizes the governing boards of 2 or more school districts to enter into an agreement for the interdistrict attendance of pupils who are residents of the school districts. If either school district fails to approve the interdistrict attendance of a pupil, or in the case of the failure or refusal of the school districts to enter into an agreement, existing law authorizes the person having legal custody of the pupil to appeal to the county board of education in accordance with a prescribed procedure. Existing law requires the county board of education to determine, within 30 calendar days after the appeal is filed, whether the pupil should be permitted to attend in the school district in which the pupil desires to attend and the applicable period of time.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

1. 02/18/11 - Introduced (filed) — source
2. 04/26/11 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
3. 06/15/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
4. 07/15/11 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
5. AB1085 (committee substitute) — source
6. 06/28/11 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

• AB 1085 DAVIS Assembly Third Reading — 66–6 (pass) · lower
• 3rd Reading AB1085 Davis By Price — 25–10 (pass) · upper
• Do pass as amended. — 8–1 (pass) · upper
• AB 1085 DAVIS Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 59–15 (pass) · lower
• Do pass as amended. — 9–0 (pass) · lower

Sponsors

• Davis — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

• 2011-02-18 Read first time. To print. reading-1
• 2011-02-20 From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
• 2011-03-14 Referred to Com. on ED. referral-committee
• 2011-03-30 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
• 2011-04-25 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 13). amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2011-04-26 Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2011-04-27 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2011-05-02 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 6. Page 1170.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2011-05-02 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
• 2011-05-12 Referred to Com. on ED. referral-committee
• 2011-06-14 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 8). amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2011-06-15 Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2011-06-23 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 25. Noes 10. Page 1535.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2011-06-23 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
• 2011-06-27 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 59. Noes 15. Page 2075.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
• 2011-06-30 Enrolled measure version corrected.
• 2011-07-07 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12:15 p.m.
• 2011-07-13 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
• 2011-07-15 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 87, Statutes of 2011.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/06efa023-4238-471b-ba41-ce7525dee5d4. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).