Files
2026-07-06 17:28:36 -04:00

7.6 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction legislature session identifier citation classification subjects status primary_sponsors version_count action_count vote_count first_action last_action source source_identifier source_url source_hash vintage source_snapshot retrieved_at confidence tags
Bill Courts. (1) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to conduct an analysis of the cost incurred by trial courts related to the default prove up process and to report on the different methods trial courts use in processing filings related to the default prove up process, as well as the revenue generated by these filings. Existing law requires the report to be provided to the Assembly Committee on Budget, the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, and the Legislative Analyst's Office by September 30, 2011. Existing law requires the Legislative Analyst's Office to provide the Assembly Committee on Budget and the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review its recommendations pertaining to the report no later than June 30, 2012. Existing law provides that these provisions will become inoperative on July 1, 2013, and are repealed on January 1, 2014. us/states/ca California Legislature 20112012 AB 110 California AB 110 (20112012)
bill
appropriation
Courts.
enacted
Blumenfield
8 33 5 2011-01-10 2011-08-30 openstates ocd-bill/ecb484e6-f58a-4c34-83a7-21ae27d18e7f http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB110 112411b8e50350c9dc9449977cfa70cca9e85dea6b89405dfe2627f651fb9622 2026-07-01 https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump 2026-07-06 reported
legislation
bill
us-ca

California AB 110 (20112012) — Courts.

(1) Existing law requires the Judicial Council to conduct an analysis of the cost incurred by trial courts related to the default prove up process and to report on the different methods trial courts use in processing filings related to the default prove up process, as well as the revenue generated by these filings. Existing law requires the report to be provided to the Assembly Committee on Budget, the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review, and the Legislative Analyst's Office by September 30, 2011. Existing law requires the Legislative Analyst's Office to provide the Assembly Committee on Budget and the Senate Committee on Budget and Fiscal Review its recommendations pertaining to the report no later than June 30, 2012. Existing law provides that these provisions will become inoperative on July 1, 2013, and are repealed on January 1, 2014.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

  1. 01/10/11 - Introduced (filed) — source
  2. 03/14/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  3. 06/28/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  4. 07/11/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  5. 07/12/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  6. 08/30/11 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
  7. AB110 (committee substitute) — source
  8. 07/14/11 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

  • Do pass. — 115 (pass) · upper
  • Do pass. — 105 (pass) · upper
  • AB 110 BLUMENFIELD Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 5024 (pass) · lower
  • 3rd Reading AB110 Blumenfield By Leno — 2316 (pass) · upper
  • AB 110 BUDGET Assembly Third Reading By BLUMENFIELD — 490 (pass) · lower

Sponsors

  • Blumenfield — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

  • 2011-01-10 Read first time. To print. reading-1
  • 2011-01-11 From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.
  • 2011-02-18 Without reference to committee. referral-committee
  • 2011-02-18 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-02-22 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 0. Page 420.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2011-02-22 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
  • 2011-03-07 Ordered to second reading.
  • 2011-03-07 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-03-14 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
  • 2011-03-15 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-03-16 Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5. referral-committee
  • 2011-03-16 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 5.) (March 16). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-03-16 Ordered to third reading.
  • 2011-06-28 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
  • 2011-06-28 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-06-28 Pursuant to Joint Rule 33.1, Joint Rule 10.5 suspended. (Page 1613.)
  • 2011-06-28 Senate Rule 29.3 suspended. (Ayes 21. Noes 14. Page 1613.)
  • 2011-06-28 Ordered to third reading.
  • 2011-07-11 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
  • 2011-07-12 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-07-12 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
  • 2011-07-13 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-07-14 Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. referral-committee
  • 2011-07-14 Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. referral-committee
  • 2011-07-14 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 5.) (July 14). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-07-14 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 23. Noes 16. Page 1846.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2011-07-14 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
  • 2011-07-14 Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 2349.)
  • 2011-07-14 Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 2349.)
  • 2011-07-14 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 24. Page 2350.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
  • 2011-08-18 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1:15 p.m.
  • 2011-08-30 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
  • 2011-08-30 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 193, Statutes of 2011.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/ecb484e6-f58a-4c34-83a7-21ae27d18e7f. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).