Existing law prohibits, with exceptions, the use of an electronic tracking device to determine the location or movement of a person. Under existing law a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law states that these provisions do not apply to the lawful use of an electronic tracking device by a law enforcement agency. Existing decisional law, in the case of U.S. v. Jones, holds that the attachment of a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device to a vehicle and the use of the device to track the vehicle is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
California AB 2055 (20112012) — Search warrants: tracking devices.
Existing law prohibits, with exceptions, the use of an electronic tracking device to determine the location or movement of a person. Under existing law a violation of these provisions is a misdemeanor. Existing law states that these provisions do not apply to the lawful use of an electronic tracking device by a law enforcement agency. Existing decisional law, in the case of U.S. v. Jones, holds that the attachment of a Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking device to a vehicle and the use of the device to track the vehicle is a search within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
AB 2055 FUENTES Consent Calendar Second Day — 72–0 (pass) · lower
AB 2055 FUENTES Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 79–0 (pass) · lower
Do pass as amended. — 7–0 (pass) · upper
Sponsors
Fuentes — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
2012-02-23 Read first time. To print. reading-1
2012-02-24 From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
2012-03-29 Referred to Com. on PUB. S. referral-committee
2012-03-29 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage
2012-04-09 Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. referral-committee
2012-04-24 From committee: Do pass as amended. To consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 17). amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
2012-04-25 Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
2012-04-26 Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. reading-2, reading-1
2012-05-03 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 4674.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
2012-05-03 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
2012-05-17 Referred to Com. on PUB. S. referral-committee
2012-08-06 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 3). amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
2012-08-07 Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
2012-08-15 Ordered to special consent calendar.
2012-08-20 From consent calendar.
2012-08-20 Ordered to third reading.
2012-08-22 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
2012-08-23 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2012-08-28 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 4886.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
2012-08-28 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.