republic-os/legislation/us/states/ca/20112012/ab-2393.md

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags

type	title	description	jurisdiction	legislature	session	identifier	citation	classification	subjects	status	primary_sponsors	version_count	action_count	vote_count	first_action	last_action	source	source_identifier	source_url	source_hash	vintage	source_snapshot	retrieved_at	confidence	tags
Bill	Family law: child support formula.	Under existing law, the parents of a minor child are responsible for supporting the child. Existing law establishes statewide uniform guidelines for calculating court-ordered child support. These guidelines provide that if an obligor's net disposable monthly income is less than $1,000, there is a rebuttable presumption that the obligor is entitled to a low-income adjustment that reduces the child support amount. Under existing law, this presumption may be rebutted by evidence that applying the low-income adjustment would be unjust and inappropriate.	us/states/ca	California Legislature	20112012	AB 2393	California AB 2393 (20112012)	bill	Family law: child support formula.	enacted	Davis	6	25	7	2012-02-24	2012-09-27	openstates	ocd-bill/f6f47d2d-45f9-4bb8-8ae3-f913d4fb1d4a	http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB2393	65849c90f38f8935f92c317254a3c515186df4c6ca4c68406132d479cc874b89	2026-07-01	https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump	2026-07-06	reported	legislation bill us-ca

California AB 2393 (20112012) — Family law: child support formula.

Under existing law, the parents of a minor child are responsible for supporting the child. Existing law establishes statewide uniform guidelines for calculating court-ordered child support. These guidelines provide that if an obligor's net disposable monthly income is less than $1,000, there is a rebuttable presumption that the obligor is entitled to a low-income adjustment that reduces the child support amount. Under existing law, this presumption may be rebutted by evidence that applying the low-income adjustment would be unjust and inappropriate.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

1. 02/24/12 - Introduced (filed) — source
2. 03/29/12 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
3. 06/18/12 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
4. 09/27/12 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
5. AB2393 (committee substitute) — source
6. 09/06/12 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

• Do pass. — 7–0 (pass) · upper
• Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. — 4–0 (pass) · upper
• AB 2393 DAVIS Consent Calendar Second Day — 73–0 (pass) · lower
• Do pass and re-refer to Committee on Appropriations with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. — 10–0 (pass) · lower
• Do pass, to Consent Calendar. — 17–0 (pass) · lower
• AB 2393 DAVIS Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 78–0 (pass) · lower
• Special Consent #16 — 37–0 (pass) · upper

Sponsors

• Davis — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

• 2012-02-24 Introduced. To print. introduction
• 2012-02-26 From printer. May be heard in committee March 27.
• 2012-02-27 Read first time. reading-1
• 2012-03-29 Referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
• 2012-03-29 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2012-04-09 Re-referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
• 2012-04-17 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2012-05-02 From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 2). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2012-05-03 Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. reading-2, reading-1
• 2012-05-10 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 4786.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2012-05-10 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
• 2012-05-24 Referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
• 2012-06-15 From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 12). amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2012-06-18 Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage, referral-committee
• 2012-06-27 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
• 2012-08-07 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 6). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2012-08-08 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2012-08-15 Ordered to special consent calendar.
• 2012-08-23 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4784.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2012-08-24 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
• 2012-08-27 Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)
• 2012-08-28 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 6438.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
• 2012-09-10 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:10 p.m.
• 2012-09-27 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
• 2012-09-27 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 646, Statutes of 2012.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/f6f47d2d-45f9-4bb8-8ae3-f913d4fb1d4a. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).