Fabio
7.8 KiB
7.8 KiB
type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
| type | title | description | jurisdiction | legislature | session | identifier | citation | classification | subjects | status | primary_sponsors | version_count | action_count | vote_count | first_action | last_action | source | source_identifier | source_url | source_hash | vintage | source_snapshot | retrieved_at | confidence | tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): determination: dispute. | (1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, which includes a local agency, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires a lead agency to file a notice of approval or a notice of determination containing specified information with the Office of Planning Research or the county clerk of each county in which the project is located, as appropriate. CEQA provides a procedure by which a party may attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the determination, finding, or decision of a public agency on specified grounds and requires that a petitioner or plaintiff name, as a real party in interest, a recipient of an approval that is the subject of an action or proceeding challenging the determination, finding, or decision of a public agency pursuant to CEQA. | us/states/ca | California Legislature | 20112012 | AB 320 | California AB 320 (20112012) |
|
|
enacted |
|
6 | 23 | 8 | 2011-02-09 | 2011-10-08 | openstates | ocd-bill/0add0bee-2591-4500-9c3b-50cd6c9cfb8c | http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB320 | 5791abdda0643472b65252d2bdefacc9fdfbd49123e2c3b9a333ea82b6a71e4f | 2026-07-01 | https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump | 2026-07-06 | reported |
|
California AB 320 (20112012) — Environmental quality: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): determination: dispute.
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, which includes a local agency, to prepare, or cause to be prepared by contract, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that may have a significant effect on the environment, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA requires a lead agency to file a notice of approval or a notice of determination containing specified information with the Office of Planning Research or the county clerk of each county in which the project is located, as appropriate. CEQA provides a procedure by which a party may attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the determination, finding, or decision of a public agency on specified grounds and requires that a petitioner or plaintiff name, as a real party in interest, a recipient of an approval that is the subject of an action or proceeding challenging the determination, finding, or decision of a public agency pursuant to CEQA.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
- 02/09/11 - Introduced (filed) — source
- 04/12/11 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
- 06/14/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
- 10/08/11 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
- AB320 (committee substitute) — source
- 09/09/11 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source
Votes
- Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Judiciary. — 4–1 (pass) · upper
- 3rd Reading AB320 Hill By Wolk — 22–15 (pass) · upper
- Do pass as amended and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. — 6–4 (pass) · lower
- Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. — 3–2 (pass) · upper
- AB 320 HILL Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 49–28 (pass) · lower
- Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Judiciary. — 6–3 (pass) · lower
- AB 320 HILL Assembly Third Reading — 46–27 (pass) · lower
- Do pass. — 12–5 (pass) · lower
Sponsors
- Hill — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- 2011-02-09 Read first time. To print.
reading-1 - 2011-02-10 From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
- 2011-02-24 Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and JUD.
referral-committee - 2011-03-22 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable - 2011-04-11 From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 4.) (April 5).
amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable - 2011-04-12 Read second time and amended.
reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage - 2011-04-13 Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
referral-committee - 2011-05-05 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 4).
committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable - 2011-05-09 Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-2, reading-1 - 2011-05-12 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 46. Noes 27. Page 1348.)
reading-3, reading-1, passage - 2011-05-12 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
reading-1 - 2011-05-26 Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and JUD.
referral-committee - 2011-06-14 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage, referral-committee - 2011-06-20 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (June 20). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable - 2011-06-28 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable - 2011-07-11 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
committee-passage - 2011-07-12 Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-2, reading-1 - 2011-08-31 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 15. Page 2188.).
reading-3, reading-1, passage - 2011-09-01 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
- 2011-09-06 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 28. Page 2930.).
committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage - 2011-09-14 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3 p.m.
- 2011-10-08 Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature - 2011-10-08 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 570, Statutes of 2011.
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/0add0bee-2591-4500-9c3b-50cd6c9cfb8c. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).