Files
2026-07-06 17:28:36 -04:00

9.5 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction legislature session identifier citation classification subjects status primary_sponsors version_count action_count vote_count first_action last_action source source_identifier source_url source_hash vintage source_snapshot retrieved_at confidence tags
Bill Transportation bond funds: transit system safety. Existing law, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, authorizes the issuance of $19.925 billion of general obligation bonds for specified purposes. Existing law requires the deposit of $1 billion of the bond proceeds in the Transit System Safety, Security, and Disaster Response Account to be used, upon appropriation, for capital projects that provide increased protection against a security and safety threat, and for capital expenditures to increase the capacity of transit operators to develop disaster response transportation systems that can move people, goods, and emergency personnel and equipment in the aftermath of a disaster impairing that movement. Existing law designates the California Emergency Management Agency as the administrative agency for this account and requires the allocation of 60% of the funds in the account for capital expenditures to transit operators and other transportation agencies using the allocation formulas applicable to the State Transit Assistance Program, and 15% of the funds for capital expenditures to specified intercity passenger rail systems and commuter rail systems. Existing law requires allocation of the 60% share of funds based on 2 different formulas also used for the State Transit Assistance Program, with 50% of available funds allocated based on population and the remaining 50% based on operator revenue. Existing law provides that entities that receive bond funds from the 15% share for intercity passenger rail systems and commuter rail systems are not eligible for the 60% share of funds. us/states/ca California Legislature 20112012 AB 427 California AB 427 (20112012)
bill
Transportation bond funds: transit system safety.
enacted
John A. Pérez
8 25 7 2011-02-14 2011-10-07 openstates ocd-bill/7771ba55-323f-4256-9e8b-efb950d9d611 http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB427 2aa586ac6ea6e71ec4d5b310fb2a8e34626e7d745388214ede58baff2088b9ce 2026-07-01 https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump 2026-07-06 reported
legislation
bill
us-ca

California AB 427 (20112012) — Transportation bond funds: transit system safety.

Existing law, the Highway Safety, Traffic Reduction, Air Quality, and Port Security Bond Act of 2006, authorizes the issuance of $19.925 billion of general obligation bonds for specified purposes. Existing law requires the deposit of $1 billion of the bond proceeds in the Transit System Safety, Security, and Disaster Response Account to be used, upon appropriation, for capital projects that provide increased protection against a security and safety threat, and for capital expenditures to increase the capacity of transit operators to develop disaster response transportation systems that can move people, goods, and emergency personnel and equipment in the aftermath of a disaster impairing that movement. Existing law designates the California Emergency Management Agency as the administrative agency for this account and requires the allocation of 60% of the funds in the account for capital expenditures to transit operators and other transportation agencies using the allocation formulas applicable to the State Transit Assistance Program, and 15% of the funds for capital expenditures to specified intercity passenger rail systems and commuter rail systems. Existing law requires allocation of the 60% share of funds based on 2 different formulas also used for the State Transit Assistance Program, with 50% of available funds allocated based on population and the remaining 50% based on operator revenue. Existing law provides that entities that receive bond funds from the 15% share for intercity passenger rail systems and commuter rail systems are not eligible for the 60% share of funds.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

  1. 02/14/11 - Introduced (filed) — source
  2. 03/29/11 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
  3. 06/29/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  4. 07/13/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  5. 08/15/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  6. 10/07/11 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
  7. AB427 (committee substitute) — source
  8. 09/06/11 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

  • AB 427 PÉREZ, J. Assembly Third Reading — 720 (pass) · lower
  • 3rd Reading AB427 John A. Pérez By Emmerson — 360 (pass) · upper
  • Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent. — 70 (pass) · upper
  • Do pass and re-refer to Committee on Appropriations with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. — 120 (pass) · lower
  • Do pass. — 125 (pass) · lower
  • Do pass. — 80 (pass) · upper
  • AB 427 PÉREZ, J. Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 771 (pass) · lower

Sponsors

  • John A. Pérez — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

  • 2011-02-14 Read first time. To print. reading-1
  • 2011-02-15 From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
  • 2011-03-25 Referred to Com. on G.O. referral-committee
  • 2011-03-29 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on G.O. Read second time and amended. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage
  • 2011-03-30 Re-referred to Com. on G.O. referral-committee
  • 2011-04-07 Re-referred to Com. on TRANS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96. referral-committee
  • 2011-04-26 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-05-05 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 4). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-05-09 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-05-12 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0. Page 1341.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2011-05-12 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
  • 2011-06-08 Referred to Com. on T. & H. referral-committee
  • 2011-06-22 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-06-29 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage, referral-committee
  • 2011-07-11 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
  • 2011-07-13 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage, referral-committee
  • 2011-08-15 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage, referral-committee
  • 2011-08-16 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (August 15). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-08-17 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-08-29 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 2083.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2011-08-29 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
  • 2011-08-31 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 1. Page 2722.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
  • 2011-09-07 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
  • 2011-10-07 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
  • 2011-10-07 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 527, Statutes of 2011.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/7771ba55-323f-4256-9e8b-efb950d9d611. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).