republic-os/legislation/us/states/ca/20112012/ab-468.md

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags

type	title	description	jurisdiction	legislature	session	identifier	citation	classification	subjects	status	primary_sponsors	version_count	action_count	vote_count	first_action	last_action	source	source_identifier	source_url	source_hash	vintage	source_snapshot	retrieved_at	confidence	tags
Bill	Property taxes: TEA formula allocation: maintenance or improvement districts: City of Simi Valley.	Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified.	us/states/ca	California Legislature	20112012	AB 468	California AB 468 (20112012)	bill	Property taxes: TEA formula allocation: maintenance or improvement districts: City of Simi Valley.	enacted	Smyth	7	24	7	2011-02-15	2011-09-26	openstates	ocd-bill/7ea32733-7bc5-45ef-8c14-acb71ea8581d	http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120AB468	e7d6b2ec65adf3f457abe257f8dff44afe3a9aba122ec394c7d4f89feda2d302	2026-07-01	https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump	2026-07-06	reported	legislation bill us-ca

California AB 468 (20112012) — Property taxes: TEA formula allocation: maintenance or improvement districts: City of Simi Valley.

Existing property tax law requires the auditor of each county with qualifying cities, as defined, to make certain property tax revenue allocations to those cities in accordance with an established Tax Equity Allocation (TEA) formula and to make corresponding reductions in the amount of property tax revenue that is allocated to the county, as specified.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

1. 02/15/11 - Introduced (filed) — source
2. 03/08/11 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
3. 05/27/11 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
4. 08/18/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
5. 09/26/11 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
6. AB468 (committee substitute) — source
7. 09/08/11 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

• 3rd Reading AB468 Smyth By Strickland Urgency Clause — 37–0 (pass) · upper
• Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent. — 9–0 (pass) · upper
• AB 468 SMYTH Third Reading Urgency — 76–0 (pass) · lower
• Do pass as amended. — 17–0 (pass) · lower
• AB 468 SMYTH Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 77–0 (pass) · lower
• Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. — 8–0 (pass) · lower
• Do pass. — 9–0 (pass) · upper

Sponsors

• Smyth — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

• 2011-02-15 Read first time. To print. reading-1
• 2011-02-16 From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
• 2011-03-03 Referred to Com. on L. GOV. referral-committee
• 2011-03-08 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2011-03-09 Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. referral-committee
• 2011-05-05 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2011-05-18 In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file. referral-committee
• 2011-05-27 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27). amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2011-05-27 Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2011-05-31 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2011-06-01 Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 1724.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2011-06-01 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
• 2011-06-08 Referred to Com. on GOV. & F. referral-committee
• 2011-06-22 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2011-07-12 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (July 11). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
• 2011-07-13 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2011-08-18 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2011-08-22 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2011-08-30 Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2129.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2011-08-31 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
• 2011-09-02 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2834.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
• 2011-09-13 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 11 a.m.
• 2011-09-26 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
• 2011-09-26 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 319, Statutes of 2011.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/7ea32733-7bc5-45ef-8c14-acb71ea8581d. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).