Existing law identifies property of a debtor that is exempt from all procedures for enforcement of a money judgment. Under existing law, those exemptions are available to a debtor in a federal bankruptcy case, whether a money judgment is being enforced by execution sale or other procedure, unless the debtor elects certain alternative exemptions. Existing law also provides that a specified portion of equity in a homestead, as defined, is exempt from execution to satisfy a judgment debt, and sets forth the amounts of the homestead exemptions available under specified circumstances. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to, every 3 years, adjust the amount of the exemptions described above based on the change in the annual California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, as specified.
California AB 929 (20112012) — Debtor exemptions: bankruptcy.
Existing law identifies property of a debtor that is exempt from all procedures for enforcement of a money judgment. Under existing law, those exemptions are available to a debtor in a federal bankruptcy case, whether a money judgment is being enforced by execution sale or other procedure, unless the debtor elects certain alternative exemptions. Existing law also provides that a specified portion of equity in a homestead, as defined, is exempt from execution to satisfy a judgment debt, and sets forth the amounts of the homestead exemptions available under specified circumstances. Existing law requires the Judicial Council to, every 3 years, adjust the amount of the exemptions described above based on the change in the annual California Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers, as specified.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. — 8–0 (pass) · lower
AB 929 WIECKOWSKI Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 53–23 (pass) · lower
Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. — 3–2 (pass) · upper
Placed on Appropriations Suspense file. — 8–0 (pass) · upper
AB 929 WIECKOWSKI Assembly Third Reading — 54–21 (pass) · lower
Sponsors
Wieckowski — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
2011-02-18 Read first time. To print. reading-1
2011-02-20 From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
2011-03-31 Referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
2011-03-31 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended. reading-2, amendment-introduction, reading-1, amendment-passage
2011-04-04 Re-referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
2011-04-26 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
2011-05-12 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 3.) (May 11). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
2011-05-16 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2011-05-19 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 21. Page 1474.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
2011-05-19 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
2011-06-02 Referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
2011-06-14 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
2011-06-27 In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
2011-08-25 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (August 25). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
2011-08-29 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2011-08-31 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
2011-09-01 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1