Fabio
5.9 KiB
5.9 KiB
type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
| type | title | description | jurisdiction | legislature | session | identifier | citation | classification | subjects | status | primary_sponsors | version_count | action_count | vote_count | first_action | last_action | source | source_identifier | source_url | source_hash | vintage | source_snapshot | retrieved_at | confidence | tags | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | Victim restitution: fines: default. | Existing law requires a court to order a defendant to make restitution in every case in which a victim has suffered economic loss as a result of the defendant's conduct. Existing law requires the restitution order to be based on the amount of loss claimed by the victim or victims, and to be of a dollar amount that is sufficient to fully reimburse the victim or victims for every determined economic loss incurred as a result of the defendant's criminal conduct, as specified. Under existing law, a restitution order imposed pursuant to these provisions is enforceable as if the order were a civil judgment. | us/states/ca | California Legislature | 20112012 | SB 1371 | California SB 1371 (20112012) |
|
|
enacted |
|
6 | 24 | 4 | 2012-02-24 | 2012-06-28 | openstates | ocd-bill/fc60a169-edc3-4598-83ae-af9fbe57c516 | http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120SB1371 | 719c6d9290c38b5fdc4eadf2106ef8f7eebb3a1cb2dd81ac90f94fa2057bb6a3 | 2026-07-01 | https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump | 2026-07-06 | reported |
|
California SB 1371 (20112012) — Victim restitution: fines: default.
Existing law requires a court to order a defendant to make restitution in every case in which a victim has suffered economic loss as a result of the defendant's conduct. Existing law requires the restitution order to be based on the amount of loss claimed by the victim or victims, and to be of a dollar amount that is sufficient to fully reimburse the victim or victims for every determined economic loss incurred as a result of the defendant's criminal conduct, as specified. Under existing law, a restitution order imposed pursuant to these provisions is enforceable as if the order were a civil judgment.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
- 02/24/12 - Introduced (filed) — source
- 04/19/12 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
- 05/16/12 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
- 06/28/12 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
- SB1371 (committee substitute) — source
- 06/19/12 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source
Votes
- Do pass, to Consent Calendar. — 6–0 (pass) · lower
- Do pass. — 7–0 (pass) · upper
- SB 1371 Anderson Consent Calendar Second Day — 79–0 (pass) · lower
- 3rd Reading (Urgency Clause) — 33–0 (pass) · upper
Sponsors
- Anderson — primary (person)
- Calderon — coauthor (person)
- Hancock — coauthor (person)
- Liu — coauthor (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- 2012-02-24 Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
introduction - 2012-02-25 From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
- 2012-02-27 Read first time.
reading-1 - 2012-03-08 Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee - 2012-04-18 Set for hearing April 24.
- 2012-04-19 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
reading-2, reading-1, committee-passage, amendment-passage, referral-committee - 2012-04-25 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 3312.) (April 24).
committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable - 2012-04-26 Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-2, reading-1 - 2012-05-09 Ordered to special consent calendar.
- 2012-05-10 From special consent calendar.
- 2012-05-10 Ordered to third reading.
- 2012-05-16 Read third time and amended.
reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage - 2012-05-16 Ordered to second reading.
- 2012-05-17 Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
reading-2, reading-1 - 2012-05-25 Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 3616.) Ordered to the Assembly.
reading-3, reading-1, passage - 2012-05-25 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
reading-1 - 2012-06-04 Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
referral-committee - 2012-06-13 From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12).
committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable - 2012-06-14 Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
reading-2, reading-1 - 2012-06-18 Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5344.) Ordered to the Senate.
reading-3, reading-1, passage - 2012-06-18 In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
- 2012-06-21 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.
- 2012-06-28 Approved by the Governor.
executive-signature - 2012-06-28 Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 49, Statutes of 2012.
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/fc60a169-edc3-4598-83ae-af9fbe57c516. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).