Files
2026-07-06 17:28:36 -04:00

6.0 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction legislature session identifier citation classification subjects status primary_sponsors version_count action_count vote_count first_action last_action source source_identifier source_url source_hash vintage source_snapshot retrieved_at confidence tags
Bill Dependent children: relative placements: disclosure. Existing law requires a court to appoint counsel for a child who is not represented by counsel in dependency proceedings, except as specified. Counsel for the child is required to investigate the interests of the child beyond the scope of the juvenile proceeding, and report to the court other interests of the child that may require protection in other administrative or judicial proceedings. Existing law requires that in any case in which a child is removed from the physical custody of his or her parents due to abuse or neglect, preferential consideration be given to a request by a relative of the child for placement of the child with the relative. us/states/ca California Legislature 20112012 SB 926 California SB 926 (20112012)
bill
Dependent children: relative placements: disclosure.
enacted
Runner
6 20 5 2011-02-18 2011-07-26 openstates ocd-bill/63fe505e-c347-4c92-bfa2-ce9799e12b3c http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201120120SB926 63cc832cf9541ecd0c226fed13a7eaaa0e434120cc728eae6f678e879d027797 2026-07-01 https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump 2026-07-06 reported
legislation
bill
us-ca

California SB 926 (20112012) — Dependent children: relative placements: disclosure.

Existing law requires a court to appoint counsel for a child who is not represented by counsel in dependency proceedings, except as specified. Counsel for the child is required to investigate the interests of the child beyond the scope of the juvenile proceeding, and report to the court other interests of the child that may require protection in other administrative or judicial proceedings. Existing law requires that in any case in which a child is removed from the physical custody of his or her parents due to abuse or neglect, preferential consideration be given to a request by a relative of the child for placement of the child with the relative.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

  1. 02/18/11 - Introduced (filed) — source
  2. 04/14/11 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  3. 06/21/11 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
  4. 07/26/11 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
  5. SB926 (committee substitute) — source
  6. 07/12/11 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

  • SB 926 Runner Consent Calendar Second Day — 770 (pass) · lower
  • Do pass and be placed on the Consent Calendar. — 50 (pass) · upper
  • Consent Calendar 2nd — 400 (pass) · upper
  • Do pass as amended, to Consent Calendar. — 100 (pass) · lower
  • Special Consent #6 — 370 (pass) · upper

Sponsors

  • Runner — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

  • 2011-02-18 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. introduction, reading-1
  • 2011-02-19 From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 21.
  • 2011-03-10 Referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
  • 2011-04-14 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD. reading-2, reading-1, committee-passage, amendment-passage, referral-committee
  • 2011-04-14 Set for hearing April 26.
  • 2011-04-27 From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 765.) (April 26). committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-04-28 Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-05-05 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 878.) Ordered to the Assembly. reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2011-05-05 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. reading-1
  • 2011-05-23 Referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
  • 2011-06-20 From committee: Do pass as amended. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 14). amendment-passage, committee-passage, committee-passage-favorable
  • 2011-06-21 Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
  • 2011-06-22 Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2011-06-27 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 2075.) Ordered to the Senate. reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2011-06-27 In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
  • 2011-07-06 Ordered to special consent calendar.
  • 2011-07-11 Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 1785.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling. committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
  • 2011-07-14 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 10 a.m.
  • 2011-07-26 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
  • 2011-07-26 Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 132, Statutes of 2011.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/63fe505e-c347-4c92-bfa2-ce9799e12b3c. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).