Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires the department to implement a quality assessment system, as prescribed, to enable the department to assess the performance of the state's developmental services system and to improve services for consumers. Under existing law, the department is required, in consultation with stakeholders, to identify a valid and reliable quality assurance instrument that assesses consumer and family satisfaction, provision of services, and personal outcomes, and, among other things, includes outcome-based measures such as health, safety, and well-being. Under existing law, the department is required to contract with an independent agency or organization that is, in part, experienced in designing valid quality assurance instruments, to implement the system.
California AB 1232 (20132014) — Developmental services: quality assessment system.
Under existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, the State Department of Developmental Services contracts with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities. Existing law requires the department to implement a quality assessment system, as prescribed, to enable the department to assess the performance of the state's developmental services system and to improve services for consumers. Under existing law, the department is required, in consultation with stakeholders, to identify a valid and reliable quality assurance instrument that assesses consumer and family satisfaction, provision of services, and personal outcomes, and, among other things, includes outcome-based measures such as health, safety, and well-being. Under existing law, the department is required to contract with an independent agency or organization that is, in part, experienced in designing valid quality assurance instruments, to implement the system.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
AB 1232 PÉREZ, V.M. Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 71–0 (pass) · lower
Do pass. — 16–0 (pass) · lower
Do pass as amended, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations Recommend Consent. — 6–0 (pass) · upper
AB 1232 PÉREZ, V.M. Assembly Third Reading — 73–0 (pass) · lower
Consent Calendar 2nd AB1232 V. Manuel Pérez — 33–0 (pass) · upper
AB 1232 PÉREZ, V.M. Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 75–0 (pass) · lower
Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. — 7–0 (pass) · lower
3rd Reading AB1232 V. Manuel Pérez By Evans — 37–0 (pass) · upper
Sponsors
V. Manuel Pérez — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
2013-02-22 Introduced. To print. introduction
2013-02-24 From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
2013-02-25 Read first time. reading-1
2013-03-11 Referred to Com. on HUM. S. referral-committee
2013-04-17 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee, committee-passage
2013-05-02 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 1). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
2013-05-06 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2013-05-09 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 1328.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
2013-05-09 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
2013-05-23 Referred to Com. on HUMAN S. referral-committee
2013-06-12 From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 11). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage, amendment-passage
2013-06-13 Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. amendment-passage, reading-2, reading-1, referral-committee
2013-06-24 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar. committee-passage
2013-06-25 Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. reading-2, reading-1
2013-07-01 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 1607.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
2013-07-01 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 3 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
2013-07-03 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 71. Noes 0. Page 2287.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
2013-08-05 Withdrawn from Engrossing and Enrolling.
2013-08-05 Action rescinded whereby the Assembly concurred in Senate amendments.
2013-08-05 Ordered to the Senate.
2013-08-12 In Senate. Held at Desk.
2013-08-22 Action rescinded whereby the bill was read third time, passed, and to Assembly. passage, reading-3
2013-08-22 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
2013-08-26 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2013-09-03 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 2104.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
2013-09-04 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 6 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
2013-09-06 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 2933.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
2013-09-25 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
2013-10-09 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
2013-10-10 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 679, Statutes of 2013.
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/4411923b-84ee-4612-a901-8f857129d878. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).