Files
2026-07-06 17:28:36 -04:00

7.1 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction legislature session identifier citation classification subjects status primary_sponsors version_count action_count vote_count first_action last_action source source_identifier source_url source_hash vintage source_snapshot retrieved_at confidence tags
Bill Family law: protective and restraining orders. Existing law requires that, subject to specified limitations, an emergency protective order be enforced before any other protective or restraining order that has been issued. If there is no emergency protective order that takes precedence in enforcement and there is more than one civil protective or restraining order regarding the same parties, existing law generally requires a peace officer to enforce the order issued last. If there is no emergency protective order that takes precedence in enforcement and both criminal and civil protective or restraining orders have been issued regarding the same parties, existing law generally requires an officer to enforce the criminal order issued last. us/states/ca California Legislature 20132014 AB 176 California AB 176 (20132014)
bill
Family law: protective and restraining orders.
enacted
Campos
6 25 7 2013-01-24 2013-09-09 openstates ocd-bill/d90dd2a4-5173-415b-9b61-6593e608bdc4 http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB176 eb8411839d314977eec25ca4e434d506e93b98e3c20587ce4cf0f6aaf616fbe6 2026-07-01 https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump 2026-07-06 reported
legislation
bill
us-ca

California AB 176 (20132014) — Family law: protective and restraining orders.

Existing law requires that, subject to specified limitations, an emergency protective order be enforced before any other protective or restraining order that has been issued. If there is no emergency protective order that takes precedence in enforcement and there is more than one civil protective or restraining order regarding the same parties, existing law generally requires a peace officer to enforce the order issued last. If there is no emergency protective order that takes precedence in enforcement and both criminal and civil protective or restraining orders have been issued regarding the same parties, existing law generally requires an officer to enforce the criminal order issued last.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

  1. 01/24/13 - Introduced (filed) — source
  2. 04/08/13 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
  3. 08/14/13 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
  4. 09/09/13 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
  5. AB176 (committee substitute) — source
  6. 08/30/13 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

  • AB 176 CAMPOS Consent Calendar Second Day — 750 (pass) · lower
  • Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. — 60 (pass) · upper
  • Do pass, but re-refer to the Committee on Public Safety. — 70 (pass) · upper
  • 3rd Reading AB176 Campos By Evans — 390 (pass) · upper
  • Do pass and re-refer to Committee on Appropriations with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. — 100 (pass) · lower
  • AB 176 CAMPOS Concurrence in Senate Amendments — 780 (pass) · lower
  • Do pass, to Consent Calendar. — 170 (pass) · lower

Sponsors

  • Campos — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

  • 2013-01-24 Read first time. To print. reading-1
  • 2013-01-25 From printer. May be heard in committee February 24.
  • 2013-02-07 Referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
  • 2013-04-02 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  • 2013-04-08 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended. amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, reading-2, reading-1
  • 2013-04-09 Re-referred to Com. on JUD. referral-committee
  • 2013-04-09 In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
  • 2013-04-16 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee, committee-passage
  • 2013-05-02 From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 1). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
  • 2013-05-06 Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2013-05-09 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 75. Noes 0. Page 1340.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2013-05-09 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
  • 2013-05-23 Referred to Coms. on JUD. and PUB. S. referral-committee
  • 2013-06-11 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 11). Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee, committee-passage
  • 2013-06-18 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee, committee-passage
  • 2013-07-01 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. committee-passage
  • 2013-07-02 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2013-08-14 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
  • 2013-08-15 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
  • 2013-08-26 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1982.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
  • 2013-08-26 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
  • 2013-08-30 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 2766.). committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage
  • 2013-08-30 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 1 p.m.
  • 2013-09-09 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
  • 2013-09-09 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 263, Statutes of 2013.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/d90dd2a4-5173-415b-9b61-6593e608bdc4. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).