republic-os/legislation/us/states/ca/20132014/ab-336.md

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags

type	title	description	jurisdiction	legislature	session	identifier	citation	classification	subjects	status	primary_sponsors	version_count	action_count	vote_count	first_action	last_action	source	source_identifier	source_url	source_hash	vintage	source_snapshot	retrieved_at	confidence	tags
Bill	Crimes: prostitution: evidence.	Existing law requires that in any of specified circumstances, including, but not limited to, rape, unlawful sexual intercourse, or sodomy, if evidence of sexual conduct of the complaining witness is offered to attack the credibility of the complaining witness, specified procedures be followed. Existing law includes, among those procedures, a requirement that a written motion be made by the defendant to the court and prosecutor stating that the defense has an offer of proof of the relevancy of evidence of the sexual conduct of the complaining witness proposed to be presented and its relevancy in attacking the credibility of the complaining witness. Existing law requires the written motion to be accompanied by an affidavit, filed and sealed, in which the offer of proof is stated. Existing law requires if the court finds that the offer of proof is sufficient, the court to order a hearing out of the presence of the jury, if any, and at the hearing allow the questioning of the complaining witness regarding the offer of proof made by the defendant. Existing law permits at the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds that evidence proposed to be offered by the defendant regarding the sexual conduct of the complaining witness is relevant and is not found inadmissible, the court to make an order stating what evidence may be introduced by the defendant, and the nature of the questions to be permitted. Existing law states that the defendant may then offer that specified evidence pursuant to the order of the court.	us/states/ca	California Legislature	20132014	AB 336	California AB 336 (20132014)	bill	Crimes: prostitution: evidence.	enacted	Ammiano	6	24	7	2013-02-13	2014-09-18	openstates	ocd-bill/063fd777-3a5d-46ef-be71-4f0d3edd02b1	http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB336	d6e86d7247519d673406835945b8be05aee046b18048d5a1fb7489dd7aa0d2b1	2026-07-01	https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump	2026-07-06	reported	legislation bill us-ca

California AB 336 (20132014) — Crimes: prostitution: evidence.

Existing law requires that in any of specified circumstances, including, but not limited to, rape, unlawful sexual intercourse, or sodomy, if evidence of sexual conduct of the complaining witness is offered to attack the credibility of the complaining witness, specified procedures be followed. Existing law includes, among those procedures, a requirement that a written motion be made by the defendant to the court and prosecutor stating that the defense has an offer of proof of the relevancy of evidence of the sexual conduct of the complaining witness proposed to be presented and its relevancy in attacking the credibility of the complaining witness. Existing law requires the written motion to be accompanied by an affidavit, filed and sealed, in which the offer of proof is stated. Existing law requires if the court finds that the offer of proof is sufficient, the court to order a hearing out of the presence of the jury, if any, and at the hearing allow the questioning of the complaining witness regarding the offer of proof made by the defendant. Existing law permits at the conclusion of the hearing, if the court finds that evidence proposed to be offered by the defendant regarding the sexual conduct of the complaining witness is relevant and is not found inadmissible, the court to make an order stating what evidence may be introduced by the defendant, and the nature of the questions to be permitted. Existing law states that the defendant may then offer that specified evidence pursuant to the order of the court.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

1. 02/13/13 - Introduced (filed) — source
2. 05/08/13 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
3. 05/29/13 - Amended Assembly (committee substitute) — source
4. 09/18/14 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
5. AB336 (committee substitute) — source
6. 08/29/14 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

• Do pass. — 5–1 (pass) · upper
• Do pass as amended. — 4–2 (pass) · lower
• Do pass. — 5–2 (pass) · upper
• Placed on Appropriations Suspense file. — 7–0 (pass) · upper
• AB 336 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading Amend By AMMIANO Set #1 — 51–24 (pass) · lower
• AB 336 AMMIANO Assembly Third Reading — 44–32 (pass) · lower
• 3rd Reading AB336 Ammiano By Mitchell — 21–13 (pass) · upper

Sponsors

• Ammiano — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

• 2013-02-13 Read first time. To print. reading-1
• 2013-02-14 From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
• 2013-02-28 Referred to Com. on PUB. S. referral-committee
• 2013-03-19 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
• 2013-05-07 From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 23). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage, amendment-passage
• 2013-05-08 Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2013-05-09 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2013-05-29 Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Ayes 51. Noes 24. Page 1720.) reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
• 2013-05-30 Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Ayes 52. Noes 25. Page 1809.)
• 2013-05-31 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 44. Noes 32. Page 1877.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2013-06-03 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
• 2013-06-13 Referred to Com. on PUB. S. referral-committee
• 2013-06-19 In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
• 2014-06-25 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (June 24). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
• 2014-06-26 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2014-07-01 Re-referred to Com. on APPR. referral-committee
• 2014-08-04 In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
• 2014-08-14 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 14). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
• 2014-08-18 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2014-08-26 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 21. Noes 13. Page 4880.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
• 2014-08-27 In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling. committee-passage
• 2014-09-08 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
• 2014-09-18 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
• 2014-09-18 Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 403, Statutes of 2014.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/063fd777-3a5d-46ef-be71-4f0d3edd02b1. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).