Existing law does not require bridges to be constructed with suicide barriers. Existing law requires a project study report or a project study report equivalent to be prepared prior to the inclusion of a transportation capital improvement project in the regional transportation improvement program, which is prepared by regional agencies, or the interregional transportation improvement program, which is prepared by the Department of Transportation. Existing law requires the California Transportation Commission to adopt the state transportation improvement program incorporating projects included in the regional transportation improvement program and the interregional transportation improvement program. Existing law also requires the department to prepare, for approval by the commission, a separate state highway operation and protection program for capital improvements that are necessary to preserve and protect the state highway system.
Existing law does not require bridges to be constructed with suicide barriers. Existing law requires a project study report or a project study report equivalent to be prepared prior to the inclusion of a transportation capital improvement project in the regional transportation improvement program, which is prepared by regional agencies, or the interregional transportation improvement program, which is prepared by the Department of Transportation. Existing law requires the California Transportation Commission to adopt the state transportation improvement program incorporating projects included in the regional transportation improvement program and the interregional transportation improvement program. Existing law also requires the department to prepare, for approval by the commission, a separate state highway operation and protection program for capital improvements that are necessary to preserve and protect the state highway system.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. — 10–1 (pass) · upper
Sponsors
Ammiano — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
2013-02-21 Read first time. To print. reading-1
2013-02-22 From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
2013-03-04 Referred to Com. on TRANS. referral-committee
2013-04-16 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee, committee-passage
2013-05-02 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (May 1). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
2013-05-06 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2013-05-16 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 57. Noes 10. Page 1449.) reading-3, reading-1, passage
2013-05-16 In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. reading-1
2013-05-29 Referred to Com. on T. & H. referral-committee
2013-08-12 From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (July 2). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage, amendment-passage
2013-08-13 Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. amendment-passage, reading-2, reading-1, referral-committee
2013-08-27 From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended. committee-passage, amendment-passage
2013-08-28 Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1, amendment-passage
2013-09-06 Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage
2013-09-09 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
2013-09-10 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 2309.). reading-3, reading-1, passage
2013-09-10 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 12 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.