republic-os/legislation/us/states/ca/20172018/sb-1106.md

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags

type	title	description	jurisdiction	legislature	session	identifier	citation	classification	subjects	status	primary_sponsors	version_count	action_count	vote_count	first_action	last_action	source	source_identifier	source_url	source_hash	vintage	source_snapshot	retrieved_at	confidence	tags
Bill	Young adults: deferred entry of judgment pilot program.	Existing law authorizes, only until January 1, 2020, the Counties of Alameda, Butte, Napa, Nevada, and Santa Clara to establish a pilot program to operate a deferred entry of judgment pilot program for eligible defendants. The pilot program authorizes a defendant to participate in the program within the county's juvenile hall if that person is charged with committing a felony offense, except as specified, he or she pleads guilty to the charge or charges, and the probation department determines that the person meets specified requirements, including that the defendant is 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age on the date the offense was committed, is suitable for the program, and shows the ability to benefit from services generally reserved for delinquents. Existing law requires a county to apply to the Board of State and Community Corrections for approval of a county institution as a suitable place for confinement for purposes of the pilot program prior to establishing a pilot program and requires the board to review and approve or deny the application, as specified. Existing law requires a county that establishes a pilot program to submit data regarding the pilot program to the board and requires the board to review the program to ensure compliance with specified requirements of federal law. Existing law requires the board to use the data submitted to it to conduct an evaluation of the pilot program's impact and effectiveness, to combine each evaluation into a comprehensive report, and to submit the comprehensive report to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Public Safety. Existing law also requires the probation department to submit data relating to the effectiveness of the program to the Division of Recidivism Reduction and Re-Entry within the Department of Justice.	us/states/ca	California Legislature	20172018	SB 1106	California SB 1106 (20172018)	bill	Young adults: deferred entry of judgment pilot program.	enacted	Hill	6	22	5	2018-02-13	2018-09-30	openstates	ocd-bill/83796af6-dad3-49b9-94f1-61a5ad3340fa	http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB1106	1a6876f01c0e39241ea9eaaaa7a75769483f01f8f81396eed8a7b668b38f4401	2026-07-01	https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump	2026-07-06	reported	legislation bill us-ca

California SB 1106 (20172018) — Young adults: deferred entry of judgment pilot program.

Existing law authorizes, only until January 1, 2020, the Counties of Alameda, Butte, Napa, Nevada, and Santa Clara to establish a pilot program to operate a deferred entry of judgment pilot program for eligible defendants. The pilot program authorizes a defendant to participate in the program within the county's juvenile hall if that person is charged with committing a felony offense, except as specified, he or she pleads guilty to the charge or charges, and the probation department determines that the person meets specified requirements, including that the defendant is 18 years of age or older, but under 21 years of age on the date the offense was committed, is suitable for the program, and shows the ability to benefit from services generally reserved for delinquents. Existing law requires a county to apply to the Board of State and Community Corrections for approval of a county institution as a suitable place for confinement for purposes of the pilot program prior to establishing a pilot program and requires the board to review and approve or deny the application, as specified. Existing law requires a county that establishes a pilot program to submit data regarding the pilot program to the board and requires the board to review the program to ensure compliance with specified requirements of federal law. Existing law requires the board to use the data submitted to it to conduct an evaluation of the pilot program's impact and effectiveness, to combine each evaluation into a comprehensive report, and to submit the comprehensive report to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Public Safety. Existing law also requires the probation department to submit data relating to the effectiveness of the program to the Division of Recidivism Reduction and Re-Entry within the Department of Justice.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

1. 02/13/18 - Introduced (filed) — source
2. 03/19/18 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
3. 04/09/18 - Amended Senate (committee substitute) — source
4. 09/30/18 - Chaptered (committee substitute) — source
5. SB1106 (committee substitute) — source
6. 08/31/18 - Enrolled (enrolled) — source

Votes

• Do pass. — 13–4 (pass) · lower
• Do pass as amended, but first amend, and re-refer to the Committee on [Appropriations] — 5–1 (pass) · upper
• Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on [Appropriations] — 6–0 (pass) · lower
• SB 1106 Hill Senate Third Reading By QUIRK — 61–16 (pass) · lower
• 3rd Reading — 27–6 (pass) · upper

Sponsors

• Hill — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

• 2018-02-13 Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print. introduction, reading-1
• 2018-02-14 From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 16.
• 2018-02-22 Referred to Com. on PUB. S. referral-committee
• 2018-03-13 Set for hearing April 3.
• 2018-03-19 From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S. reading-2, referral-committee, amendment-passage, committee-passage, reading-1
• 2018-04-05 From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 4516.) (April 3). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage, amendment-passage
• 2018-04-09 Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. amendment-passage, reading-2, referral-committee, reading-1
• 2018-04-13 Set for hearing April 23.
• 2018-04-23 From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. committee-passage, reading-2
• 2018-04-24 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2018-04-26 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 6. Page 4834.) Ordered to the Assembly. reading-3, passage, reading-1
• 2018-04-26 In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk. reading-1
• 2018-05-03 Referred to Com. on PUB. S. referral-committee
• 2018-06-12 From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage, referral-committee
• 2018-06-27 June 27 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
• 2018-08-16 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 4.) (August 16). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
• 2018-08-20 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-2, reading-1
• 2018-08-27 Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 61. Noes 16. Page 6593.) Ordered to the Senate. reading-3, passage, reading-1
• 2018-08-28 In Senate. Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
• 2018-09-05 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
• 2018-09-30 Approved by the Governor. executive-signature
• 2018-09-30 Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 1007, Statutes of 2018.

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/83796af6-dad3-49b9-94f1-61a5ad3340fa. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).