(1) The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act of 2016 (AUMA) , an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities. MAUCRSA establishes in state government a Cannabis Control Appeals Panel to review specified decisions of licensing authorities appealed by any person aggrieved by those decisions. MAUCRSA requires that the panel consist of one member appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules, one member appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly, and 3 members appointed by the Governor, as specified. Existing law requires that each member, at the time of their initial appointment, be a resident of a different county from the one in which either of the other appointed members resides.
(1) The Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act of 2016 (AUMA) , an initiative measure approved as Proposition 64 at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license and applicable local ordinances. The Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities. MAUCRSA establishes in state government a Cannabis Control Appeals Panel to review specified decisions of licensing authorities appealed by any person aggrieved by those decisions. MAUCRSA requires that the panel consist of one member appointed by the Senate Committee on Rules, one member appointed by the Speaker of the Assembly, and 3 members appointed by the Governor, as specified. Existing law requires that each member, at the time of their initial appointment, be a resident of a different county from the one in which either of the other appointed members resides.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
AB 1872 BUDGET Concurrence in Senate Amendments By TING — 72–0 (pass) · lower
Sponsors
Committee on Budget — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
2020-01-07 Read first time. To print. reading-1
2020-01-08 From printer. May be heard in committee February 7.
2020-01-17 Referred to Com. on BUDGET. referral-committee
2020-02-25 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on BUDGET. Read second time and amended. reading-1, reading-2, amendment-passage, amendment-introduction
2020-02-26 Re-referred to Com. on BUDGET. referral-committee
2020-08-25 From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R. reading-1, reading-2, amendment-passage, referral-committee, amendment-introduction
2020-08-27 In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
2020-08-29 From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 5.) (August 29). committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage
2020-08-30 Read second time. Ordered to third reading. reading-1, reading-2
2020-08-31 Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 9.). passage, reading-3, reading-1
2020-08-31 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
Fabio