Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.3 KiB
type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
| type | title | description | jurisdiction | legislature | session | identifier | citation | classification | subjects | status | primary_sponsors | version_count | action_count | vote_count | first_action | last_action | source | source_identifier | source_url | source_hash | vintage | source_snapshot | retrieved_at | confidence | tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | MOT VEH FRANCHISE-REIMBURSE | Amends the Motor Vehicle Franchise Act. Provides that if a manufacturer or other franchiser has entered into an agreement with a dealer under which the franchiser is to be reimbursed for parts that the dealer has used in making repairs covered by a warranty, the amount of the reimbursement shall be the difference between the price of the part under the agreement and the prevailing price charged for that part by similar dealers in the area. Provides that the franchiser may not increase the amount of the required reimbursement to reflect additional costs. Provides that, at the request of the dealer, the franchiser shall provide information indicating how the reimbursement amount was calculated. Provides that a dealer may not disclose any confidential information that the dealer obtains regarding any other dealer as a result of the request, unless the disclosure is made in legal proceedings or under order of the Motor Vehicle Review Board or a court of competent jurisdiction. Provides that a franchiser may not take any adverse action against a dealer for failing to enter a reimbursement agreement with the franchiser or for charging the prevailing price for a part. Effective immediately. | us/states/il | Illinois General Assembly | 94th | HB 4425 | Illinois HB 4425 (94th) |
|
enacted | 3 | 29 | 2 | 2006-01-06 | 2006-06-20 | openstates | ocd-bill/1de9e817-5113-41c3-b604-09422963f8b4 | http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4425&GAID=8&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=22632&SessionID=50&GA=94 | 29bbe1a31d690a53f099d248497b8a470e11a71d724410c90650025e91739c5c | 2026-07-01 | https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump | 2026-07-06 | reported |
|
Illinois HB 4425 (94th) — MOT VEH FRANCHISE-REIMBURSE
Amends the Motor Vehicle Franchise Act. Provides that if a manufacturer or other franchiser has entered into an agreement with a dealer under which the franchiser is to be reimbursed for parts that the dealer has used in making repairs covered by a warranty, the amount of the reimbursement shall be the difference between the price of the part under the agreement and the prevailing price charged for that part by similar dealers in the area. Provides that the franchiser may not increase the amount of the required reimbursement to reflect additional costs. Provides that, at the request of the dealer, the franchiser shall provide information indicating how the reimbursement amount was calculated. Provides that a dealer may not disclose any confidential information that the dealer obtains regarding any other dealer as a result of the request, unless the disclosure is made in legal proceedings or under order of the Motor Vehicle Review Board or a court of competent jurisdiction. Provides that a franchiser may not take any adverse action against a dealer for failing to enter a reimbursement agreement with the franchiser or for charging the prevailing price for a part. Effective immediately.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
Votes
- Third Reading — 113–0 (pass) · lower
- Third Reading — 56–0 (pass) · upper
Sponsors
- Art Tenhouse — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- 2006-01-06 Filed with the Clerk by Rep. Art Tenhouse
filing - 2006-01-10 First Reading
reading-1 - 2006-01-10 Referred to Rules Committee
referral-committee - 2006-01-18 Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
referral-committee - 2006-01-24 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Randall M. Hultgren
- 2006-01-24 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. John A. Fritchey
- 2006-01-25 Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 012-000-000
committee-passage - 2006-01-25 Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
- 2006-01-26 Second Reading - Short Debate
reading-2 - 2006-01-26 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
- 2006-01-31 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. William B. Black
- 2006-01-31 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Jim Watson
- 2006-01-31 Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 113-000-000
reading-3, passage - 2006-02-01 Arrive in Senate
introduction - 2006-02-01 Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading February 2, 2006
reading-1 - 2006-02-01 Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Donne E. Trotter
- 2006-02-01 First Reading
reading-1 - 2006-02-01 Referred to Rules
referral-committee - 2006-03-01 Assigned to Commerce & Economic Development
referral-committee - 2006-03-16 Do Pass Commerce & Economic Development; 007-000-000
committee-passage - 2006-03-16 Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading March 22, 2006
- 2006-03-27 Second Reading
reading-2 - 2006-03-27 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading March 28, 2006
- 2006-03-28 Third Reading - Passed; 056-000-000
reading-3, passage - 2006-03-28 Passed Both Houses
- 2006-04-26 Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt - 2006-06-20 Governor Approved
executive-signature - 2006-06-20 Effective Date June 20, 2006
- 2006-06-20 Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-0882
became-law
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/1de9e817-5113-41c3-b604-09422963f8b4. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official Illinois legislature records).