Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
6.1 KiB
type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
| type | title | description | jurisdiction | legislature | session | identifier | citation | classification | subjects | status | primary_sponsors | version_count | action_count | vote_count | first_action | last_action | source | source_identifier | source_url | source_hash | vintage | source_snapshot | retrieved_at | confidence | tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | CIV PRO-INFORMANT'S PRIVILEGE | Amends the Code of Civil Procedure to create an informant's privilege. Provides that if an individual (i) submits information concerning a criminal act to a law enforcement agency or to a community organization that acts as an intermediary in reporting to law enforcement and (ii) requests anonymity, then the identity of that individual is privileged and confidential and is not subject to discovery or admissible in evidence in a proceeding. Provides that there is no privilege if a court, after a hearing in camera, finds that the party seeking discovery or the proponent of the evidence has shown that: (1) the identity of an individual who submits information concerning a criminal act is sought or offered in a court proceeding involving a felony or misdemeanor; (2) the evidence is not otherwise available; and (3) nondisclosure infringes upon a constitutional right of an accused, or there is a need for the evidence that substantially outweighs the interest in protecting confidentiality. Provides that the court may impose such sanctions as are necessary to enforce its order. | us/states/il | Illinois General Assembly | 94th | HB 598 | Illinois HB 598 (94th) |
|
enacted | 3 | 30 | 2 | 2005-01-27 | 2005-07-12 | openstates | ocd-bill/a9edf224-808e-49ac-b6d4-3bcc96da4c8e | http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=598&GAID=8&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=14991&SessionID=50&GA=94 | 1586cb442177c1e19bf835f8e82156b9e199b5e10a84efb3635ed9a690bb7d6e | 2026-07-01 | https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump | 2026-07-06 | reported |
|
Illinois HB 598 (94th) — CIV PRO-INFORMANT'S PRIVILEGE
Amends the Code of Civil Procedure to create an informant's privilege. Provides that if an individual (i) submits information concerning a criminal act to a law enforcement agency or to a community organization that acts as an intermediary in reporting to law enforcement and (ii) requests anonymity, then the identity of that individual is privileged and confidential and is not subject to discovery or admissible in evidence in a proceeding. Provides that there is no privilege if a court, after a hearing in camera, finds that the party seeking discovery or the proponent of the evidence has shown that: (1) the identity of an individual who submits information concerning a criminal act is sought or offered in a court proceeding involving a felony or misdemeanor; (2) the evidence is not otherwise available; and (3) nondisclosure infringes upon a constitutional right of an accused, or there is a need for the evidence that substantially outweighs the interest in protecting confidentiality. Provides that the court may impose such sanctions as are necessary to enforce its order.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
Votes
- Third Reading — 117–0 (pass) · lower
- Third Reading — 58–0 (pass) · upper
Sponsors
- William B. Black — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- 2005-01-27 Filed with the Clerk by Rep. William B. Black
filing - 2005-01-27 First Reading
reading-1 - 2005-01-27 Referred to Rules Committee
referral-committee - 2005-02-02 Assigned to Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee
referral-committee - 2005-02-10 Do Pass / Short Debate Judiciary II - Criminal Law Committee; 013-000-000
committee-passage - 2005-02-14 Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
- 2005-02-16 Second Reading - Short Debate
reading-2 - 2005-02-16 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
- 2005-02-17 Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 117-000-000
reading-3, passage - 2005-02-17 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Donald L. Moffitt
- 2005-02-17 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Naomi D. Jakobsson
- 2005-02-17 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Jack D. Franks
- 2005-02-17 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Linda Chapa LaVia
- 2005-02-23 Arrive in Senate
introduction - 2005-02-23 Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading February 24, 2005
reading-1 - 2005-02-23 Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. Richard J. Winkel, Jr.
- 2005-02-24 First Reading
reading-1 - 2005-02-24 Referred to Rules
referral-committee - 2005-03-15 Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. George P. Shadid
- 2005-04-13 Assigned to Judiciary
referral-committee - 2005-04-20 Do Pass Judiciary; 008-000-000
committee-passage - 2005-04-20 Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading April 21, 2005
- 2005-05-16 Second Reading
reading-2 - 2005-05-16 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading May 17, 2005
- 2005-05-17 Third Reading - Passed; 058-000-000
reading-3, passage - 2005-05-17 Passed Both Houses
- 2005-06-15 Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt - 2005-07-12 Governor Approved
executive-signature - 2005-07-12 Effective Date January 1, 2006
- 2005-07-12 Public Act . . . . . . . . . 94-0174
became-law
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/a9edf224-808e-49ac-b6d4-3bcc96da4c8e. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official Illinois legislature records).