Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
9.5 KiB
type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
| type | title | description | jurisdiction | legislature | session | identifier | citation | classification | subjects | status | primary_sponsors | version_count | action_count | vote_count | first_action | last_action | source | source_identifier | source_url | source_hash | vintage | source_snapshot | retrieved_at | confidence | tags | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | MVFA-CONSOLIDATED DEALERSHIPS | Amends the Motor Vehicle Franchise Act. Provides that for a period of 4 years from the date a motor vehicle manufacturer acquires, succeeds to, or assumes any part of the business of a bankrupted manufacturer it is unlawful for the succeeding manufacturer to enter into a same line make franchise with any person or to relocate any existing same line make franchise, for a line make of the bankrupted manufacturer that would be located or relocated within the relevant market area of a former franchisee without first offering the former franchisee the additional or relocated franchise, unless (i) as a result of a former franchisee's cancellation, termination, noncontinuance, or nonrenewal of the franchise, the bankrupted manufacturer had consolidated the line make with another of its line makes with a franchisee who operates a facility located within that relevant market area; (ii) the successor manufacturer paid the former franchisee the fair market value of the former franchisee's franchise; or (iii) the successor manufacturer proves that the former franchisee is unfit to own or manage the dealership. Prohibits a manufacturer, a distributor, a wholesaler, a distributor branch or division, a factory branch or division, or a wholesale branch or division, or officer, agent or other representative thereof from directly or indirectly conditioning the awarding of a franchise to a prospective new motor vehicle dealer, the addition of a line make or franchise to an existing dealer, the renewal of a franchise of an existing dealer, the approval of the relocation of an existing dealer's facility, or the approval of the sale or transfer of the ownership of a franchise on the willingness of a dealer, proposed new dealer, or owner of an interest in the dealership facility to enter into a site control agreement or exclusive use agreement. Defines terms. Effective immediately. | us/states/il | Illinois General Assembly | 96th | HB 4628 | Illinois HB 4628 (96th) |
|
enacted | 3 | 51 | 3 | 2009-09-29 | 2009-11-25 | openstates | ocd-bill/74716875-cd92-4b2a-b462-b58032ab1d66 | http://ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=4628&GAID=10&DocTypeID=HB&LegId=48562&SessionID=76&GA=96 | 454251e9f610191519e6bc1c482b9729ff2d8d06fa973643f675dd0083606444 | 2026-07-01 | https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump | 2026-07-06 | reported |
|
Illinois HB 4628 (96th) — MVFA-CONSOLIDATED DEALERSHIPS
Amends the Motor Vehicle Franchise Act. Provides that for a period of 4 years from the date a motor vehicle manufacturer acquires, succeeds to, or assumes any part of the business of a bankrupted manufacturer it is unlawful for the succeeding manufacturer to enter into a same line make franchise with any person or to relocate any existing same line make franchise, for a line make of the bankrupted manufacturer that would be located or relocated within the relevant market area of a former franchisee without first offering the former franchisee the additional or relocated franchise, unless (i) as a result of a former franchisee's cancellation, termination, noncontinuance, or nonrenewal of the franchise, the bankrupted manufacturer had consolidated the line make with another of its line makes with a franchisee who operates a facility located within that relevant market area; (ii) the successor manufacturer paid the former franchisee the fair market value of the former franchisee's franchise; or (iii) the successor manufacturer proves that the former franchisee is unfit to own or manage the dealership. Prohibits a manufacturer, a distributor, a wholesaler, a distributor branch or division, a factory branch or division, or a wholesale branch or division, or officer, agent or other representative thereof from directly or indirectly conditioning the awarding of a franchise to a prospective new motor vehicle dealer, the addition of a line make or franchise to an existing dealer, the renewal of a franchise of an existing dealer, the approval of the relocation of an existing dealer's facility, or the approval of the sale or transfer of the ownership of a franchise on the willingness of a dealer, proposed new dealer, or owner of an interest in the dealership facility to enter into a site control agreement or exclusive use agreement. Defines terms. Effective immediately.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
Votes
- Third Reading — 56–1 (pass) · upper
- Third Reading — 115–0 (pass) · lower
- Concurrence — 113–0 (pass) · lower
Sponsors
- William B. Black — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- 2009-09-29 Filed with the Clerk by Rep. William B. Black
filing - 2009-09-30 First Reading
reading-1 - 2009-09-30 Referred to Rules Committee
referral-committee - 2009-10-08 Assigned to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
referral-committee - 2009-10-09 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Jay C. Hoffman
- 2009-10-09 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. John A. Fritchey
- 2009-10-14 Final Action Deadline Extended-9(b) November 30, 2009
- 2009-10-14 House Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Clerk by Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
amendment-introduction - 2009-10-14 House Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted in Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; by Voice Vote
amendment-passage - 2009-10-14 Do Pass as Amended / Short Debate Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 016-000-000
committee-passage - 2009-10-14 Placed on Calendar 2nd Reading - Short Debate
- 2009-10-14 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Chapin Rose
- 2009-10-14 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. JoAnn D. Osmond
- 2009-10-14 Added Chief Co-Sponsor Rep. Dave Winters
- 2009-10-14 Second Reading - Short Debate
reading-2 - 2009-10-14 Held on Calendar Order of Second Reading - Short Debate
reading-2 - 2009-10-15 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading - Short Debate
- 2009-10-15 Third Reading - Short Debate - Passed 115-000-000
reading-3, passage - 2009-10-15 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Dan Reitz
- 2009-10-15 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Mike Bost
- 2009-10-15 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Roger L. Eddy
- 2009-10-16 Arrive in Senate
introduction - 2009-10-16 Placed on Calendar Order of First Reading
reading-1 - 2009-10-16 Chief Senate Sponsor Sen. James F. Clayborne, Jr.
- 2009-10-16 Added as Alternate Chief Co-Sponsor Sen. John J. Millner
- 2009-10-16 First Reading
reading-1 - 2009-10-16 Referred to Assignments
referral-committee - 2009-10-22 Assigned to Transportation
referral-committee - 2009-10-27 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Filed with Secretary by Sen. James F. Clayborne, Jr.
amendment-introduction - 2009-10-27 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Referred to Assignments
referral-committee - 2009-10-28 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Assignments Refers to Transportation
- 2009-10-28 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Adopted
amendment-passage - 2009-10-28 Do Pass as Amended Transportation; 009-000-000
committee-passage - 2009-10-28 Placed on Calendar Order of 2nd Reading October 28, 2009
- 2009-10-28 Second Reading
reading-2 - 2009-10-28 Placed on Calendar Order of 3rd Reading October 29, 2009
- 2009-10-29 Rule 2-10 Third Reading Deadline Established As December 31, 2009
reading-3 - 2009-10-29 Third Reading - Passed; 056-001-001
reading-3, passage - 2009-10-29 Arrived in House
introduction - 2009-10-29 Placed on Calendar Order of Concurrence Senate Amendment(s) 1
- 2009-10-29 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion Filed Concur Rep. William B. Black
- 2009-10-29 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Referred to Rules Committee
referral-committee - 2009-10-30 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Rules Referred to Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee
referral-committee - 2009-10-30 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 Motion to Concur Recommends Be Adopted Judiciary I - Civil Law Committee; 016-000-000
- 2009-10-30 Added Co-Sponsor Rep. Patrick J. Verschoore
- 2009-10-30 Senate Committee Amendment No. 1 House Concurs 113-000-000
- 2009-10-30 Passed Both Houses
- 2009-11-04 Sent to the Governor
executive-receipt - 2009-11-25 Governor Approved
executive-signature - 2009-11-25 Effective Date November 25, 2009
- 2009-11-25 Public Act . . . . . . . . . 96-0824
became-law
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/74716875-cd92-4b2a-b462-b58032ab1d66. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official Illinois legislature records).