c5c7033001
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
8.4 KiB
8.4 KiB
type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
| type | title | description | jurisdiction | legislature | session | identifier | citation | classification | subjects | status | primary_sponsors | version_count | action_count | vote_count | first_action | last_action | source | source_identifier | source_url | source_hash | vintage | source_snapshot | retrieved_at | confidence | tags | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | HCS/SS/SCS/SBs 907, 1154 & 1272 - This act creates the "Act Against Abusive Website or Web Content Access Litigation". The Attorney General on behalf of a class of residents of this state, the state, or a political subdivision that is subject to litigation that alleges any website or web content access violation, or any resident of this state, the state, or a political subdivision of this state that is subject to litigation that alleges any website or web content access violation, may file a civil action against the party, attorney, or law firm that initiated such litigation for a determination as to whether such litigation alleging a website or web content access violation is abusive litigation. In determining whether a civil action alleging a website or web content access claim is considered abusive, the court shall consider the totality of the circumstances to find whether the primary purpose of the litigation was to obtain payment from a defendant due to the costs of defending the action in court. The act describes the factors to be considered in making this determination. | HCS/SS/SCS/SBs 907, 1154 & 1272 - This act creates the "Act Against Abusive Website or Web Content Access Litigation". The Attorney General on behalf of a class of residents of this state, the state, or a political subdivision that is subject to litigation that alleges any website or web content access violation, or any resident of this state, the state, or a political subdivision of this state that is subject to litigation that alleges any website or web content access violation, may file a civil action against the party, attorney, or law firm that initiated such litigation for a determination as to whether such litigation alleging a website or web content access violation is abusive litigation. In determining whether a civil action alleging a website or web content access claim is considered abusive, the court shall consider the totality of the circumstances to find whether the primary purpose of the litigation was to obtain payment from a defendant due to the costs of defending the action in court. The act describes the factors to be considered in making this determination. | us/states/mo | Missouri General Assembly | 2026 | SB 907 | Missouri SB 907 (2026) |
|
enacted |
|
7 | 35 | 0 | 2025-12-01T06:00:00+00:00 | 2026-05-07T05:00:00+00:00 | openstates | ocd-bill/f16e6e7c-afc9-4e0b-8720-3b7b5623f966 | https://www.senate.mo.gov/BillTracking/Bills/BillInformation?year=2026&billid=286 | 43e52316dfe28e086862191a04ed67c3878cbbce6401124f74620f6c694f9f94 | 2026-07-01 | https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump | 2026-07-06 | reported |
|
Missouri SB 907 (2026) — HCS/SS/SCS/SBs 907, 1154 & 1272 - This act creates the "Act Against Abusive Website or Web Content Access Litigation". The Attorney General on behalf of a class of residents of this state, the state, or a political subdivision that is subject to litigation that alleges any website or web content access violation, or any resident of this state, the state, or a political subdivision of this state that is subject to litigation that alleges any website or web content access violation, may file a civil action against the party, attorney, or law firm that initiated such litigation for a determination as to whether such litigation alleging a website or web content access violation is abusive litigation. In determining whether a civil action alleging a website or web content access claim is considered abusive, the court shall consider the totality of the circumstances to find whether the primary purpose of the litigation was to obtain payment from a defendant due to the costs of defending the action in court. The act describes the factors to be considered in making this determination.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
- 5627S.01I - Introduced (filed) — source
- 3/24/2026 - SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Gregory-15)--(5627S07.03S) 3/24/2026 - Adopted (committee substitute) — source
- 3/24/2026 - SS for SCS S offered (Hudson)--(5627S.07F) 3/24/2026 - Adopted, as amended (committee substitute) — source
- 5627H.09C - House Committee Substitute (committee substitute) — source
- 5627H.09T - Truly Agreed to and Finally Passed (committee substitute) — source
- 5627S.05C - Senate Committee Substitute (committee substitute) — source
- 5627S.07P - Perfected (committee substitute) — source
Sponsors
- Hudson, Brad — primary (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- 2026-05-07T05:00:00+00:00 Letter of approval from the Governor
- 2026-05-06T05:00:00+00:00 Signed by Governor
executive-signature - 2026-04-23T05:00:00+00:00 Delivered to Governor
- 2026-04-23T05:00:00+00:00 Signed by House Speaker
- 2026-04-23T05:00:00+00:00 Signed by Senate President Pro Tem
- 2026-04-23T05:00:00+00:00 Reported Duly Enrolled Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions & Ethics Committee
- 2026-04-21T05:00:00+00:00 Truly Agreed To and Finally Passed
passage - 2026-04-21T05:00:00+00:00 S Third Read and Passed
passage, reading-3 - 2026-04-21T05:00:00+00:00 S concurs in HCS, as amended
- 2026-04-16T05:00:00+00:00 H Third Read and Passed
passage, reading-3 - 2026-04-16T05:00:00+00:00 HCS, as amended, H adopted --(5627H.09C)
- 2026-04-16T05:00:00+00:00 HA 2 to HCS H offered & adopted (Seitz)--(5627H09.02H)
- 2026-04-16T05:00:00+00:00 HA 1 to HCS H offered & adopted (Seitz)--(5627H09.03H)
- 2026-04-14T05:00:00+00:00 HCS Reported Do Pass H Consent and Procedure
committee-passage - 2026-04-13T05:00:00+00:00 HCS Voted Do Pass H Consent and Procedure
committee-passage - 2026-04-08T05:00:00+00:00 Referred H Consent and Procedure
referral-committee - 2026-04-08T05:00:00+00:00 HCS Reported Do Pass H Commerce - Consent
committee-passage - 2026-04-08T05:00:00+00:00 HCS Voted Do Pass H Commerce - Consent
committee-passage - 2026-04-01T05:00:00+00:00 Hearing Conducted H Commerce
- 2026-03-26T05:00:00+00:00 Referred H Commerce
referral-committee - 2026-03-26T05:00:00+00:00 H Second Read
reading-2 - 2026-03-25T05:00:00+00:00 H First Read
reading-1 - 2026-03-25T05:00:00+00:00 S Third Read and Passed
passage, reading-3 - 2026-03-24T05:00:00+00:00 Reported Truly Perfected S Rules, Joint Rules, Resolutions and Ethics Committee
- 2026-03-24T05:00:00+00:00 Perfected
- 2026-03-24T05:00:00+00:00 SS for SCS, as amended, S adopted
passage - 2026-03-24T05:00:00+00:00 SA 2 to SS for SCS S offered & defeated (Webber)--(5627S07.01S)
- 2026-03-24T05:00:00+00:00 SA 1 to SS for SCS S offered & adopted (Gregory-15)--(5627S07.03S)
- 2026-03-24T05:00:00+00:00 SS for SCS S offered (Hudson)--(5627S.07F)
- 2026-03-09T05:00:00+00:00 Reported from S General Laws Committee w/SCS
- 2026-02-25T06:00:00+00:00 SCS Voted Do Pass w/SCS SBs 907, 1154 & 1272 General Laws Committee (5627S.05C)
committee-passage - 2026-02-04T06:00:00+00:00 Hearing Conducted S General Laws Committee
- 2026-01-08T06:00:00+00:00 Second Read and Referred S General Laws Committee
reading-2, referral-committee - 2026-01-07T06:00:00+00:00 S First Read
reading-1 - 2025-12-01T06:00:00+00:00 Prefiled
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/f16e6e7c-afc9-4e0b-8720-3b7b5623f966. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official Missouri legislature records).