Files
2026-07-06 17:28:36 -04:00

9.4 KiB
Raw Permalink Blame History

type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction legislature session identifier citation classification subjects status primary_sponsors version_count action_count vote_count first_action last_action source source_identifier source_url source_hash vintage source_snapshot retrieved_at confidence tags
Bill Criminal cases; ex parte requests for expert assistance. Ex parte requests for expert assistance in criminal cases. Provides that in any case in which a defendant is charged with a felony offense or a Class 1 misdemeanor and determined to be indigent by the court, the defendant or his attorney, upon notice to the Commonwealth, may move the court to designate another judge in the same circuit to hear an ex parte request for appointment of a qualified expert to assist in the defense. For a motion for expert assistance, the bill requires a defendant or his attorney to state under oath or in a sworn declaration that a need for confidentiality exists. Upon receiving the defendant's or his attorney's declaration of need for confidentiality, the court is required to conduct an ex parte hearing as soon as practicable on the request for authorization to obtain expert assistance. After a hearing upon the motion, the court is required to authorize the defendant or his attorney to obtain expert assistance upon a showing that the requested assistance would materially assist the defendant and that the denial of such services would result in a fundamentally unfair trial.Under current law, in a capital case, a defendant or his attorney is required to show, in an adversarial proceeding before the trial judge, a particularized need for confidentiality of the request for expert assistance. Upon a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that a particularized need for confidentiality of the expert services exists, the court holds an ex parte hearing and may order the appointment of a qualified expert upon a showing that the provision of the requested expert services would materially assist the defendant in preparing his defense and the lack of such confidential assistance would result in a fundamentally unfair trial. There is no such procedure to appoint a qualified expert in noncapital cases. us/states/va Virginia General Assembly 2020 HB 824 Virginia HB 824 (2020)
bill
enacted
Patrick A. Hope
5 45 12 2020-01-07 2020-04-10 openstates ocd-bill/6e4cdaa5-6ef4-4967-acfb-eb052475deda https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?201+sum+HB824 380ae3ca9bfb2692cbd4b300f10c305c183f8be33257f938c3ffd45af719830d 2026-07-01 https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump 2026-07-06 reported
legislation
bill
us-va

Virginia HB 824 (2020) — Criminal cases; ex parte requests for expert assistance.

Ex parte requests for expert assistance in criminal cases. Provides that in any case in which a defendant is charged with a felony offense or a Class 1 misdemeanor and determined to be indigent by the court, the defendant or his attorney, upon notice to the Commonwealth, may move the court to designate another judge in the same circuit to hear an ex parte request for appointment of a qualified expert to assist in the defense. For a motion for expert assistance, the bill requires a defendant or his attorney to state under oath or in a sworn declaration that a need for confidentiality exists. Upon receiving the defendant's or his attorney's declaration of need for confidentiality, the court is required to conduct an ex parte hearing as soon as practicable on the request for authorization to obtain expert assistance. After a hearing upon the motion, the court is required to authorize the defendant or his attorney to obtain expert assistance upon a showing that the requested assistance would materially assist the defendant and that the denial of such services would result in a fundamentally unfair trial.Under current law, in a capital case, a defendant or his attorney is required to show, in an adversarial proceeding before the trial judge, a particularized need for confidentiality of the request for expert assistance. Upon a finding, by clear and convincing evidence, that a particularized need for confidentiality of the expert services exists, the court holds an ex parte hearing and may order the appointment of a qualified expert upon a showing that the provision of the requested expert services would materially assist the defendant in preparing his defense and the lack of such confidential assistance would result in a fundamentally unfair trial. There is no such procedure to appoint a qualified expert in noncapital cases.

Version chain

The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.

  1. Acts of Assembly Chapter text (CHAP1124) (committee substitute) — source
  2. Bill text as passed House and Senate (HB824ER) (committee substitute) — source
  3. Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB824H1 (committee substitute) — source
  4. Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB824H1 (committee substitute) — source
  5. Impact statement from DPB (HB824S1) (committee substitute) — source

Votes

  • Passed Senate with substitute (35-Y 5-N) — 355 (pass) · upper
  • Constitutional reading dispensed (32-Y 0-N) — 320 (pass) · upper
  • VOTE: Adoption (87-Y 12-N) — 8612 (pass) · lower
  • VOTE: REJECTED (0-Y 97-N) — 096 (fail) · lower
  • Reported from Judiciary with substitute (12-Y 2-N) — 122 (pass) · upper
  • Conference report agreed to by Senate (37-Y 3-N) — 373 (pass) · upper
  • Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (6-Y 1-N) — 61 (pass) · lower
  • Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 2-N) — 152 (pass) · lower
  • Senate insisted on substitute (38-Y 0-N) — 380 (pass) · upper
  • Reconsideration of conference report agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N) — 400 (pass) · upper
  • VOTE: Passage (93-Y 6-N) — 926 (pass) · lower
  • Conference report agreed to by Senate (34-Y 5-N) — 345 (pass) · upper

Sponsors

  • Patrick A. Hope — primary (person)

Timeline

The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.

  • 2020-01-07 Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/08/20 20105153D introduction
  • 2020-01-07 Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice referral-committee
  • 2020-01-28 Assigned Courts sub: Criminal referral-committee
  • 2020-02-06 House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
  • 2020-02-06 Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (6-Y 1-N)
  • 2020-02-07 Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (15-Y 2-N) committee-passage
  • 2020-02-07 Committee substitute printed 20107597D-H1 substitution
  • 2020-02-09 Read first time reading-1
  • 2020-02-10 Read second time reading-2
  • 2020-02-10 Committee substitute agreed to 20107597D-H1
  • 2020-02-10 Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB824H1
  • 2020-02-11 Read third time and passed House (93-Y 6-N) passage, reading-3
  • 2020-02-11 VOTE: Passage (93-Y 6-N)
  • 2020-02-12 Constitutional reading dispensed
  • 2020-02-12 Referred to Committee on the Judiciary referral-committee
  • 2020-02-19 Reported from Judiciary with substitute (12-Y 2-N) committee-passage
  • 2020-02-19 Committee substitute printed 20108750D-S1 substitution
  • 2020-02-21 Impact statement from DPB (HB824S1)
  • 2020-02-21 Constitutional reading dispensed (32-Y 0-N)
  • 2020-02-24 Read third time reading-3
  • 2020-02-24 Reading of substitute waived
  • 2020-02-24 Committee substitute agreed to 20108750D-S1
  • 2020-02-24 Engrossed by Senate - committee substitute HB824S1
  • 2020-02-24 Passed Senate with substitute (35-Y 5-N) passage
  • 2020-02-26 Placed on Calendar
  • 2020-02-26 Senate substitute rejected by House 20108750D-S1 (0-Y 97-N)
  • 2020-02-26 VOTE: REJECTED (0-Y 97-N)
  • 2020-02-28 Senate insisted on substitute (38-Y 0-N)
  • 2020-02-28 Senate requested conference committee
  • 2020-03-02 House acceded to request
  • 2020-03-02 Conferees appointed by House
  • 2020-03-03 Conferees appointed by Senate
  • 2020-03-05 Amended by conference committee
  • 2020-03-05 Conference report agreed to by House (87-Y 12-N)
  • 2020-03-05 VOTE: Adoption (87-Y 12-N)
  • 2020-03-07 Conference report agreed to by Senate (37-Y 3-N)
  • 2020-03-07 Reconsideration of conference report agreed to by Senate (40-Y 0-N)
  • 2020-03-08 Conference report agreed to by Senate (34-Y 5-N)
  • 2020-03-18 Enrolled
  • 2020-03-18 Signed by President
  • 2020-03-19 Signed by Speaker
  • 2020-03-20 Impact statement from DPB (HB824ER)
  • 2020-03-20 Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 20, 2020
  • 2020-03-20 Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2020
  • 2020-04-10 Approved by Governor-Chapter 1124 (effective 7/1/20) executive-signature

Source

OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/6e4cdaa5-6ef4-4967-acfb-eb052475deda. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official Virginia legislature records).