Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
7.2 KiB
type, title, description, jurisdiction, legislature, session, identifier, citation, classification, subjects, status, primary_sponsors, version_count, action_count, vote_count, first_action, last_action, source, source_identifier, source_url, source_hash, vintage, source_snapshot, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
| type | title | description | jurisdiction | legislature | session | identifier | citation | classification | subjects | status | primary_sponsors | version_count | action_count | vote_count | first_action | last_action | source | source_identifier | source_url | source_hash | vintage | source_snapshot | retrieved_at | confidence | tags | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bill | Guardianship visitation requirements; DARS shall convene a work group to review and evaluate. | Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services; work group; review and evaluate guardianship visitation requirements; report. Directs the Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services to convene a work group to (i) evaluate how a requirement for private guardians to visit the individual under their guardianship in person at least once every 90 days would reduce the availability of willing and qualified individuals to serve as private guardians, if at all; (ii) consider whether a different number and frequency of visits per year, other than at least once every 90 days, would better balance resource constraints with the importance of guardian visits to the incapacitated person under their care; (iii) determine the additional resources, if any, needed to mitigate the negative impacts of an increased visitation requirement on the willingness and availability of qualified individuals to serve as private guardians; (iv) determine how those resources could be allocated to the relevant private and public entities in the guardianship system to promote compliance with an increased visitation requirement; and (v) determine whether expansion of the Virginia Public Guardian and Conservator Program would substantially alleviate issues related to these concerns. The Department shall submit a summary of its recommendations to the Chairmen of the House Committee for Courts of Justice and the Senate Committee on the Judiciary by November 1, 2022. | us/states/va | Virginia General Assembly | 2022 | HB 634 | Virginia HB 634 (2022) |
|
enacted |
|
4 | 30 | 6 | 2022-01-11 | 2022-04-08 | openstates | ocd-bill/4bec3743-f944-4c57-b6b2-e84aeabcb0f9 | https://lis.virginia.gov/cgi-bin/legp604.exe?221+sum+HB634 | 1480a278019c9621b8ea790d33944ddfa06640e468c0f1b62d3ba459e9683279 | 2026-07-01 | https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump | 2026-07-06 | reported |
|
Virginia HB 634 (2022) — Guardianship visitation requirements; DARS shall convene a work group to review and evaluate.
Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services; work group; review and evaluate guardianship visitation requirements; report. Directs the Department for Aging and Rehabilitative Services to convene a work group to (i) evaluate how a requirement for private guardians to visit the individual under their guardianship in person at least once every 90 days would reduce the availability of willing and qualified individuals to serve as private guardians, if at all; (ii) consider whether a different number and frequency of visits per year, other than at least once every 90 days, would better balance resource constraints with the importance of guardian visits to the incapacitated person under their care; (iii) determine the additional resources, if any, needed to mitigate the negative impacts of an increased visitation requirement on the willingness and availability of qualified individuals to serve as private guardians; (iv) determine how those resources could be allocated to the relevant private and public entities in the guardianship system to promote compliance with an increased visitation requirement; and (v) determine whether expansion of the Virginia Public Guardian and Conservator Program would substantially alleviate issues related to these concerns. The Department shall submit a summary of its recommendations to the Chairmen of the House Committee for Courts of Justice and the Senate Committee on the Judiciary by November 1, 2022.
Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
- CHAP0242 (committee substitute) — source
- Committee substitute printed 22105845D-H1 (committee substitute) — source
- HB634ER (committee substitute) — source
- Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22104036D (committee substitute) — source
Votes
- Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N) — 8–0 (pass) · lower
- Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N) — 40–0 (pass) · upper
- Reported from Judiciary (15-Y 0-N) — 15–0 (pass) · upper
- VOTE: Passage (99-Y 0-N) — 98–0 (pass) · lower
- Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N) — 40–0 (pass) · upper
- Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (20-Y 0-N) — 20–0 (pass) · lower
Sponsors
- Danica A. Roem — primary (person)
- Charniele L. Herring — cosponsor (person)
Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- 2022-01-11 Prefiled and ordered printed; offered 01/12/22 22104036D
introduction - 2022-01-11 Referred to Committee for Courts of Justice
referral-committee - 2022-01-24 Impact statement from DPB (HB634)
- 2022-01-25 Assigned Courts sub: Subcommittee #2
referral-committee - 2022-02-02 House subcommittee amendments and substitutes offered
- 2022-02-02 Subcommittee recommends reporting with substitute (8-Y 0-N)
- 2022-02-07 House committee, floor amendments and substitutes offered
- 2022-02-07 Reported from Courts of Justice with substitute (20-Y 0-N)
committee-passage - 2022-02-07 Committee substitute printed 22105845D-H1
substitution - 2022-02-09 Read first time
reading-1 - 2022-02-10 Impact statement from DPB (HB634H1)
- 2022-02-10 Read second time
reading-2 - 2022-02-10 Committee substitute agreed to 22105845D-H1
- 2022-02-10 Engrossed by House - committee substitute HB634H1
- 2022-02-11 Read third time and passed House BLOCK VOTE (99-Y 0-N)
passage, reading-3 - 2022-02-11 VOTE: Passage (99-Y 0-N)
- 2022-02-14 Constitutional reading dispensed
- 2022-02-14 Referred to Committee on the Judiciary
referral-committee - 2022-02-28 Reported from Judiciary (15-Y 0-N)
committee-passage - 2022-03-01 Constitutional reading dispensed (40-Y 0-N)
- 2022-03-02 Read third time
reading-3 - 2022-03-02 Passed by temporarily
- 2022-03-02 Passed Senate (40-Y 0-N)
passage - 2022-03-07 Enrolled
- 2022-03-08 Impact statement from DPB (HB634ER)
- 2022-03-08 Signed by Speaker
- 2022-03-08 Signed by President
- 2022-03-22 Enrolled Bill communicated to Governor on March 22, 2022
- 2022-03-22 Governor's Action Deadline 11:59 p.m., April 11, 2022
- 2022-04-08 Approved by Governor-Chapter 242 (effective 7/1/22)
executive-signature
Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot 2026-07-01; origin ocd-bill/4bec3743-f944-4c57-b6b2-e84aeabcb0f9. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official Virginia legislature records).