Files
republic-os/legal/us/code/title-35/chapter-12/section-131.md
T
Fabio 76b8ec33a7 Legal corpus: the complete U.S. Code (59,740 sections, all 53 titles)
Ingested titles 12–51 and 54 from OLRC USLM XML @119-100 (the whole Code
now, uniform edition; Title 53 is reserved/empty). LegalText 11,221 ->
59,740; repo total 105,704 records. Deterministic (byte-identical rerun,
verified on Title 42's 8,356 sections); make check green. make
legal-us-code default now covers every title.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 10:51:44 -04:00

3.7 KiB
Raw Blame History

type, title, description, jurisdiction, corpus, kind, title_number, title_name, chapter_number, chapter_name, section, citation, status, release_point, release_date, source, source_url, source_identifier, source_file, source_hash, raw_snapshot_hash, text_hash, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction corpus kind title_number title_name chapter_number chapter_name section citation status release_point release_date source source_url source_identifier source_file source_hash raw_snapshot_hash text_hash retrieved_at confidence tags
LegalText 35 U.S.C. § 131 Examination of application us united_states_code code_section 35 PATENTS 12 EXAMINATION OF APPLICATION 131 35 U.S.C. § 131 current 119-100 2026-06-26 official https://uscode.house.gov/download/releasepoints/us/pl/119/100/xml_usc35@119-100.zip /us/usc/t35/s131 data/legal/raw/us/code/title-35/usc35.xml 207aad969e0d6c72e8cbcf31f1f02d9d8232c87358836179523c60bbb216a1e4 736cab508592dcf50013a1aed5ab108f72fd8493e76afc46848cdc35da38bbe3 56268d7eab13b1fd686125e8b6e009702ce1d1f907d75580a625cef8f672ca90 2026-07-04 official
legal
us-code

35 U.S.C. § 131 - Examination of application

Text

The Director shall cause an examination to be made of the application and the alleged new invention; and if on such examination it appears that the applicant is entitled to a patent under the law, the Director shall issue a patent therefor.

(July 19, 1952, ch. 950, 66 Stat. 801; Pub. L. 106113, div. B, § 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4732(a)(10)(A)], Nov. 29, 1999, 113 Stat. 1536, 1501A582; Pub. L. 107273, div. C, title III, § 13206(b)(1)(B), Nov. 2, 2002, 116 Stat. 1906.)

Notes

Historical and Revision NotesBased on Title 35, U.S.C., 1946 ed., § 36 (R.S. 4893). The first part is revised in language and amplified. The phrase “and that the invention is sufficiently useful and important” is omitted as unnecessary, the requirements for patentability being stated in sections 101, 102 and 103.

Editorial Notes

Amendments2002—Pub. L. 107273 made technical correction to directory language of Pub. L. 106113. See 1999 Amendment note below. 1999—Pub. L. 106113, as amended by Pub. L. 107273, substituted “Director” for “Commissioner” in two places.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1999 AmendmentAmendment by Pub. L. 106113 effective 4 months after Nov. 29, 1999, see section 1000(a)(9) [title IV, § 4731] of Pub. L. 106113, set out as a note under section 1 of this title.

Pre-Prosecution Assessment Pilot ProgramPub. L. 117328, div. W, § 106, Dec. 29, 2022, 136 Stat. 5521, provided that: “(a) Pilot Program.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Dec. 29, 2022], the Director shall establish a pilot program to assist first-time prospective patent applicants in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of a potential patent application submitted by such a prospective applicant. “(b) Considerations.—In developing the pilot program required under subsection (a), the Director shall establish—“(1) a notification process to notify a prospective patent applicant seeking an assessment described in that subsection that any assessment so provided may not be considered an official ruling of patentability from the Office; “(2) conditions to determine eligibility for the pilot program, taking into consideration available resources; “(3) reasonable limitations on the amount of time to be spent providing assistance to each individual first-time prospective patent applicant; “(4) procedures for referring prospective patent applicants to legal counsel, including through the patent pro bono programs; and “(5) procedures to protect the confidentiality of the information disclosed by prospective patent applicants.” [For definitions of terms used in section 106 of div. W of Pub. L. 117328, set out above, see section 102 of div. W of Pub. L. 117328, set out as a Definitions note under section 1 of this title.]