Files
republic-os/legal/us/code/title-42/chapter-16/section-1862s.md
T
Fabio 76b8ec33a7 Legal corpus: the complete U.S. Code (59,740 sections, all 53 titles)
Ingested titles 12–51 and 54 from OLRC USLM XML @119-100 (the whole Code
now, uniform edition; Title 53 is reserved/empty). LegalText 11,221 ->
59,740; repo total 105,704 records. Deterministic (byte-identical rerun,
verified on Title 42's 8,356 sections); make check green. make
legal-us-code default now covers every title.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 10:51:44 -04:00

4.2 KiB
Raw Blame History

type, title, description, jurisdiction, corpus, kind, title_number, title_name, chapter_number, chapter_name, section, citation, status, release_point, release_date, source, source_url, source_identifier, source_file, source_hash, raw_snapshot_hash, text_hash, retrieved_at, confidence, tags
type title description jurisdiction corpus kind title_number title_name chapter_number chapter_name section citation status release_point release_date source source_url source_identifier source_file source_hash raw_snapshot_hash text_hash retrieved_at confidence tags
LegalText 42 U.S.C. § 1862s Reaffirmation of merit-based peer review us united_states_code code_section 42 THE PUBLIC HEALTH AND WELFARE 16 NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 1862s 42 U.S.C. § 1862s current 119-100 2026-06-26 official https://uscode.house.gov/download/releasepoints/us/pl/119/100/xml_usc42@119-100.zip /us/usc/t42/s1862s data/legal/raw/us/code/title-42/usc42.xml 69d6b99b2c5e2fc812df3e249155f880ddfc81241a67e0fc021416965acfddb1 644321055a08eb1f260a6a3e31ac157fa024756abf612a9fd6857e7e400cf24e 45bfc038a5c831af85c6e654c2f62ec956c24331fe27527860b6faad87b4371f 2026-07-04 official
legal
us-code

42 U.S.C. § 1862s - Reaffirmation of merit-based peer review

Text

(a) Sense of Congress It is the sense of Congress that—

(1) sustained, predictable Federal funding of basic research is essential to United States leadership in science and technology;

(2) the Foundations intellectual merit and broader impacts criteria are appropriate for evaluating grant proposals, as concluded by the 2011 National Science Board Task Force on Merit Review;

(3) evaluating proposals on the basis of the Foundations intellectual merit and broader impacts criteria should be used to assure that the Foundations activities are in the national interest as these reviews can affirm that—

(A) the proposals funded by the Foundation are of high quality and advance scientific knowledge; and

(B) the Foundations grants address societal needs through basic research findings or through related activities; and

(4) as evidenced by the Foundations contributions to scientific advancement, economic growth, human health, and national security, its peer review and merit review processes have identified and funded scientifically and societally relevant basic research and should be preserved.

(b) Merit review criteria The Foundation shall maintain the intellectual merit and broader impacts criteria, among other specific criteria as appropriate, as the basis for evaluating grant proposals in the merit review process.

(c) Updates If after January 6, 2017, a change is made to the merit-review process, the Director shall submit a report to the appropriate committees of Congress not later than 30 days after the date of the change.

(Pub. L. 114329, title I, § 101, Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2970.)

Notes

Editorial Notes

Codification Section was enacted as part of the American Innovation and Competitiveness Act, and not as part of the National Science Foundation Act of 1950 which comprises this chapter.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Definitions Pub. L. 114329, § 2, Jan. 6, 2017, 130 Stat. 2970, provided that: “In this Act [see Short Title of 2017 Amendment note set out under section 1861 of this title and Tables], unless expressly provided otherwise: “(1) Appropriate committees of congress.—The term appropriate committees of Congress means the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation of the Senate and the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology of the House of Representatives. “(2) Federal science agency.—The term Federal science agency has the meaning given the term in section 103 of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 (42 U.S.C. 6623). “(3) Foundation.—The term Foundation means the National Science Foundation. “(4) Institution of higher education.—The term institution of higher education has the meaning given the term in section 101(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1001(a)). “(5) NIST.—The term NIST means the National Institute of Standards and Technology. “(6) STEM.—The term STEM has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the American [sic] COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 [Pub. L. 111358] (42 U.S.C. 6621 note). “(7) STEM education.—The term STEM education has the meaning given the term in section 2 of the STEM Education Act of 2015 [Pub. L. 11459] (42 U.S.C. 6621 note).”