Fabio
76b8ec33a7
Ingested titles 12–51 and 54 from OLRC USLM XML @119-100 (the whole Code now, uniform edition; Title 53 is reserved/empty). LegalText 11,221 -> 59,740; repo total 105,704 records. Deterministic (byte-identical rerun, verified on Title 42's 8,356 sections); make check green. make legal-us-code default now covers every title. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
42 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
42 lines
2.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
type: "LegalText"
|
||
title: "22 U.S.C. § 5860"
|
||
description: "Report on special nuclear materials"
|
||
jurisdiction: "us"
|
||
corpus: "united_states_code"
|
||
kind: "code_section"
|
||
title_number: 22
|
||
title_name: "FOREIGN RELATIONS AND INTERCOURSE"
|
||
chapter_number: "67"
|
||
chapter_name: "FREEDOM FOR RUSSIA AND EMERGING EURASIAN DEMOCRACIES AND OPEN MARKETS SUPPORT"
|
||
section: "5860"
|
||
citation: "22 U.S.C. § 5860"
|
||
status: "current"
|
||
release_point: "119-100"
|
||
release_date: "2026-06-26"
|
||
source: "official"
|
||
source_url: "https://uscode.house.gov/download/releasepoints/us/pl/119/100/xml_usc22@119-100.zip"
|
||
source_identifier: "/us/usc/t22/s5860"
|
||
source_file: "data/legal/raw/us/code/title-22/usc22.xml"
|
||
source_hash: "410798640f102fbc96dedb13047b6d85e23308ede5a789cc8518963ec10782c1"
|
||
raw_snapshot_hash: "b9c63ede722f5e0bf8eabfe9029e06e312ab9bcfd95c4d1424ed515baff1df83"
|
||
text_hash: "4fedeb78b737836213a80d7724e5a8700b91eea456b41e7983f3a27842293c19"
|
||
retrieved_at: "2026-07-04"
|
||
confidence: "official"
|
||
tags: ["legal", "us-code"]
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 22 U.S.C. § 5860 - Report on special nuclear materials
|
||
|
||
## Text
|
||
|
||
Not later than 180 days after October 24, 1992, the Secretary of State shall prepare, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of Energy, and shall transmit to the Congress a report on the possible alternatives for the ultimate disposition of special nuclear materials of the former Soviet Union. This report shall include—
|
||
|
||
(1) a cost-benefit analysis comparing (A) the relative merits of the indefinite storage and safeguarding of such materials in the independent states of the former Soviet Union and (B) its acquisition by the United States by purchase, barter, or other means;
|
||
|
||
(2) a discussion of relevant issues such as the protection of United States uranium producers from dumping, the relative vulnerability of these stocks of special nuclear materials to illegal proliferation, and the potential electrical and other savings associated with their being made available in the fuel cycle in the United States; and
|
||
|
||
(3) a discussion of how highly enriched uranium stocks could be diluted for reactor fuel.
|
||
|
||
(Pub. L. 102–511, title V, § 510, Oct. 24, 1992, 106 Stat. 3344.)
|