Files
Fabio 76b8ec33a7 Legal corpus: the complete U.S. Code (59,740 sections, all 53 titles)
Ingested titles 12–51 and 54 from OLRC USLM XML @119-100 (the whole Code
now, uniform edition; Title 53 is reserved/empty). LegalText 11,221 ->
59,740; repo total 105,704 records. Deterministic (byte-identical rerun,
verified on Title 42's 8,356 sections); make check green. make
legal-us-code default now covers every title.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-07-06 10:51:44 -04:00

50 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
type: "LegalText"
title: "28 U.S.C. § 2264"
description: "Scope of Federal review; district court adjudications"
jurisdiction: "us"
corpus: "united_states_code"
kind: "code_section"
title_number: 28
title_name: "JUDICIARY AND JUDICIAL PROCEDURE"
chapter_number: "154"
chapter_name: "SPECIAL HABEAS CORPUS PROCEDURES IN CAPITAL CASES"
section: "2264"
citation: "28 U.S.C. § 2264"
status: "current"
release_point: "119-100"
release_date: "2026-06-26"
source: "official"
source_url: "https://uscode.house.gov/download/releasepoints/us/pl/119/100/xml_usc28@119-100.zip"
source_identifier: "/us/usc/t28/s2264"
source_file: "data/legal/raw/us/code/title-28/usc28.xml"
source_hash: "72c05741c08e1cab741330f6808e5a68e2286d9e37e42da892a298c1e6ef1fa7"
raw_snapshot_hash: "3390f867a2c02f5d0c496269da780795fe19663a090a3040c64a9ee0a541cdcf"
text_hash: "a8d6d12aaed9803bfd498718dd4230a66381071f2272558a5aa903b9b1878108"
retrieved_at: "2026-07-04"
confidence: "official"
tags: ["legal", "us-code"]
---
# 28 U.S.C. § 2264 - Scope of Federal review; district court adjudications
## Text
(a) Whenever a State prisoner under capital sentence files a petition for habeas corpus relief to which this chapter applies, the district court shall only consider a claim or claims that have been raised and decided on the merits in the State courts, unless the failure to raise the claim properly is—
(1) the result of State action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States;
(2) the result of the Supreme Courts recognition of a new Federal right that is made retroactively applicable; or
(3) based on a factual predicate that could not have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence in time to present the claim for State or Federal post-conviction review.
(b) Following review subject to subsections (a), (d), and (e) of section 2254, the court shall rule on the claims properly before it.
(Added Pub. L. 104132, title I, § 107(a), Apr. 24, 1996, 110 Stat. 1223.)
## Notes
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective DateSection applicable to cases pending on or after Apr. 24, 1996, see section 107(c) of Pub. L. 104132, set out as a note under section 2261 of this title.