Fabio
00a184bb3c
Raw OLRC USLM XML zips @ release 119-100 (retrieved 2026-07-04 via Atlas depot), ingested with the standard pipeline: raw snapshot -> per-section OKF markdown -> manifest + checksums. Title 52 untouched. LegalText: 171 -> 11,221. Titles 12-54 await a clean OLRC retry. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
54 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
54 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
type: "LegalText"
|
||
title: "10 U.S.C. § 6115"
|
||
description: "Major warhead refurbishment program"
|
||
jurisdiction: "us"
|
||
corpus: "united_states_code"
|
||
kind: "code_section"
|
||
title_number: 10
|
||
title_name: "ARMED FORCES"
|
||
chapter_number: "602"
|
||
chapter_name: "NUCLEAR WEAPONS STOCKPILE MATTERS"
|
||
section: "6115"
|
||
citation: "10 U.S.C. § 6115"
|
||
status: "current"
|
||
release_point: "119-100"
|
||
release_date: "2026-06-26"
|
||
source: "official"
|
||
source_url: "https://uscode.house.gov/download/releasepoints/us/pl/119/100/xml_usc10@119-100.zip"
|
||
source_identifier: "/us/usc/t10/s6115"
|
||
source_file: "data/legal/raw/us/code/title-10/usc10.xml"
|
||
source_hash: "4b44f48d2ce559fb1ad7e6108981b8629878d0e3fc6c34dc4dbfb4975696cea0"
|
||
raw_snapshot_hash: "06a2679d38355c44f4219c983fdad34009233205d6ba271593a4c1b17a739ec1"
|
||
text_hash: "7e105f494a6819d45244740ac6412d1c2fafc57c4ad90fbe5734ea6fdd3619d7"
|
||
retrieved_at: "2026-07-04"
|
||
confidence: "official"
|
||
tags: ["legal", "us-code"]
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
# 10 U.S.C. § 6115 - Major warhead refurbishment program
|
||
|
||
## Text
|
||
|
||
In fiscal year 2015 and subsequent fiscal years, the Secretary of Energy shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report, on each major warhead refurbishment program that reaches the Phase 6.3 milestone, that provides an analysis of alternatives. Such report shall include—
|
||
|
||
(1) a full description of alternatives considered prior to the award of Phase 6.3;
|
||
|
||
(2) a comparison of the costs and benefits of each of those alternatives, to include an analysis of trade-offs among cost, schedule, and performance objectives against each alternative considered;
|
||
|
||
(3) identification of the cost and risk of critical technology elements associated with each alternative, including technology maturity, integration risk, manufacturing feasibility, and demonstration needs;
|
||
|
||
(4) identification of the cost and risk of additional capital asset and infrastructure capabilities required to support production and certification of each alternative;
|
||
|
||
(5) a comparative analysis of the risks, costs, and scheduling needs for any military requirement intended to enhance warhead safety, security, or maintainability, including any requirement to consolidate and/or integrate warhead systems or mods as compared to at least one other feasible refurbishment alternative the Nuclear Weapons Council considers appropriate; and
|
||
|
||
(6) a life-cycle cost estimate for the alternative selected that details the overall cost, scope, and schedule planning assumptions.
|
||
|
||
(Added Pub. L. 119–60, div. C, title XXXI, § 3111(a), Dec. 18, 2025, 139 Stat. 1352.)
|
||
|
||
## Notes
|
||
|
||
Editorial Notes
|
||
|
||
Prior ProvisionsA prior section 6115, act Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 382, prescribed a time limit for filing claims for drill pay and for the uniform gratuity. Section was also amended by Pub. L. 85–861, § 33(a)(31), which amended catchline by substituting “uniform gratuity” for “unform gratuity”, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 85–861, § 36B(17), Sept. 2, 1958, 72 Stat. 1571. Provisions similar to those in this section were contained in section 2523c of Title 50, War and National Defense, prior to repeal by Pub. L. 119–60, § 3111(b)(3).
|