Files
republic-os/legislation/us/states/ca/20132014/ab-229.md
T
2026-07-06 17:28:36 -04:00

106 lines
9.1 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
---
type: "Bill"
title: "Local government: infrastructure and revitalization financing districts."
description: "Existing law authorizes the creation by a city, county, or city and county of an infrastructure financing district, as defined, for the sole purpose of financing public facilities, subject to adoption of a resolution by the legislative body and affected taxing entities proposed to be subject to division of taxes and 23 voter approval. Existing law authorizes the legislative body to, by majority vote, initiate proceedings to issue bonds for the financing of district projects by adopting a resolution, subject to specified procedures and 23 voter approval. Existing law requires an infrastructure financing plan to include the date on which an infrastructure financing district will cease to exist, which may not be more than 30 years from the date on which the ordinance forming the district is adopted. Existing law prohibits a district from including any portion of a redevelopment project area. Existing law, the Polanco Redevelopment Act, authorizes a redevelopment agency to take any action that the agency determines is necessary and consistent with state and federal laws to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances on, under, or from property within a project area, whether the agency owns that property or not, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also declares the intent of the Legislature that the areas of the district created be substantially undeveloped, and that the establishment of a district should not ordinarily lead to the removal of dwelling units."
jurisdiction: "us/states/ca"
legislature: "California Legislature"
session: "20132014"
identifier: "AB 229"
citation: "California AB 229 (20132014)"
classification: ["bill"]
subjects: ["Local government: infrastructure and revitalization financing districts."]
status: "enacted"
primary_sponsors: ["John A. Pérez"]
version_count: 7
action_count: 27
vote_count: 6
first_action: "2013-02-04"
last_action: "2014-09-29"
source: "openstates"
source_identifier: "ocd-bill/b9c2c704-922b-44da-bffb-0cb1b7a44fc1"
source_url: "http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229"
source_hash: "5615e34afe27201f6e59e40551de21f10615ced7bae0386348cc3973e538c899"
vintage: "2026-07-01"
source_snapshot: "https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump"
retrieved_at: "2026-07-06"
confidence: "reported"
tags: ["legislation", "bill", "us-ca"]
---
# California AB 229 (20132014) — Local government: infrastructure and revitalization financing districts.
Existing law authorizes the creation by a city, county, or city and county of an infrastructure financing district, as defined, for the sole purpose of financing public facilities, subject to adoption of a resolution by the legislative body and affected taxing entities proposed to be subject to division of taxes and 23 voter approval. Existing law authorizes the legislative body to, by majority vote, initiate proceedings to issue bonds for the financing of district projects by adopting a resolution, subject to specified procedures and 23 voter approval. Existing law requires an infrastructure financing plan to include the date on which an infrastructure financing district will cease to exist, which may not be more than 30 years from the date on which the ordinance forming the district is adopted. Existing law prohibits a district from including any portion of a redevelopment project area. Existing law, the Polanco Redevelopment Act, authorizes a redevelopment agency to take any action that the agency determines is necessary and consistent with state and federal laws to remedy or remove a release of hazardous substances on, under, or from property within a project area, whether the agency owns that property or not, subject to specified conditions. Existing law also declares the intent of the Legislature that the areas of the district created be substantially undeveloped, and that the establishment of a district should not ordinarily lead to the removal of dwelling units.
## Version chain
The bill's text revisions, in order — the diff chain from filing to enrollment.
1. **02/04/13 - Introduced** (filed) — [source](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billPdf.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229&version=20130AB22999INT)
2. **04/08/13 - Amended Assembly** (committee substitute) — [source](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billPdf.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229&version=20130AB22998AMD)
3. **06/11/13 - Amended Senate** (committee substitute) — [source](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billPdf.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229&version=20130AB22997AMD)
4. **08/12/13 - Amended Senate** (committee substitute) — [source](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billPdf.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229&version=20130AB22996AMD)
5. **09/29/14 - Chaptered** (committee substitute) — [source](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billPdf.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229&version=20130AB22994CHP)
6. **AB229** (committee substitute) — [source](http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229)
7. **08/29/14 - Enrolled** (enrolled) — [source](https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billPdf.xhtml?bill_id=201320140AB229&version=20130AB22995ENR)
## Votes
- Do pass. — **161** (pass) · lower
- Do pass and be re-referred to the Committee on Appropriations. — **81** (pass) · lower
- 3rd Reading AB229 John A. Pérez By Monning — **306** (pass) · upper
- AB 229 PÉREZ, J. Assembly Third Reading — **713** (pass) · lower
- AB 229 PÉREZ, J. Concurrence in Senate Amendments — **744** (pass) · lower
- Do pass as amended, and re-refer to the Committee on Appropriations. — **61** (pass) · upper
## Sponsors
- John A. Pérez — primary (person)
- Atkins — coauthor (person)
- Bonilla — coauthor (person)
- Bonta — coauthor (person)
- Cooley — coauthor (person)
- DeSaulnier — coauthor (person)
- Dickinson — coauthor (person)
- Gordon — coauthor (person)
- Harkey — coauthor (person)
- Quirk-Silva — coauthor (person)
- Torres — coauthor (person)
- Wagner — coauthor (person)
## Timeline
The legislative action history — every referral, reading, and vote.
- **2013-02-04** Read first time. To print. `reading-1`
- **2013-02-05** From printer. May be heard in committee March 7.
- **2013-02-15** Referred to Com. on L. GOV. `referral-committee`
- **2013-04-08** From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended. `amendment-introduction, amendment-passage, reading-2, reading-1`
- **2013-04-09** Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. `referral-committee`
- **2013-04-18** From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR. `committee-passage-favorable, referral-committee, committee-passage`
- **2013-05-02** From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 16. Noes 1.) (May 1). `committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage`
- **2013-05-06** Read second time. Ordered to third reading. `reading-2, reading-1`
- **2013-05-09** Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 71. Noes 3. Page 1329.) `reading-3, reading-1, passage`
- **2013-05-09** In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. `reading-1`
- **2013-05-23** Referred to Com. on GOV. & F. `referral-committee`
- **2013-06-10** From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 5). `committee-passage-favorable, committee-passage, amendment-passage`
- **2013-06-11** Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR. `amendment-passage, reading-2, reading-1, referral-committee`
- **2013-06-24** From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8. `committee-passage`
- **2013-06-25** Read second time. Ordered to third reading. `reading-2, reading-1`
- **2013-08-12** Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading. `reading-3, reading-1, amendment-passage`
- **2013-08-13** Read second time. Ordered to third reading. `reading-2, reading-1`
- **2013-08-22** Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 6. Page 1942.). `reading-3, reading-1, passage`
- **2013-08-22** In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
- **2013-09-11** Ordered to inactive file at the request of Assembly Member Atkins.
- **2014-08-26** From inactive file.
- **2014-08-26** Ordered to the unfinished business file.
- **2014-08-27** Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 4. Page 6535.). `committee-passage-favorable, amendment-passage`
- **2014-09-04** Enrolled measure version corrected.
- **2014-09-08** Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
- **2014-09-29** Approved by the Governor. `executive-signature`
- **2014-09-29** Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 775, Statutes of 2014.
## Source
OpenStates / OpenCivicData bulk snapshot [2026-07-01](https://data.openstates.org/daily/2026-07-01/public.pgdump); origin `ocd-bill/b9c2c704-922b-44da-bffb-0cb1b7a44fc1`. Confidence: reported (aggregated from official California legislature records).